Winds of Change.NET: Liberty. Discovery. Humanity. Victory.

Formal Affiliations
  • Anti-Idiotarian Manifesto
  • Euston Democratic Progressive Manifesto
  • Real Democracy for Iran!
  • Support Denamrk
  • Million Voices for Darfur
  • milblogs
Syndication
 Subscribe in a reader

U.S. Military: What's Next

| 2 Comments | 1 TrackBack

Weekend Pundit reminds us about several weapon systems in the Pentagon's pipeline. Each offers a piece of the technological puzzle represented by the term "transformation." Each has strengths and limitations, too, which will be hotly debated. Still, it's a good introduction. As WP puts it: "prepare to be amazed."

Still, each weapon will also have to find its way into practice and changed doctrine before it can make a real difference. In that critical respect, it's no different than the new technology you sometimes see at work. What matters is how it's used, how it matches needs on the ground, and how it fits into new and more effective ways of doing things. Otherwise, it can easily become a waste.

What does that mean for a military, exactly? For a very detailed (and sometimes quite technical) look, you'll want to read this set of after-action reviews by the U.S. Marines in the wake of Gulf War II. How their gear performed, what they need, what worked, what didn't.

UPDATE: Maj. Donald Sensing (ret.) looks into the Marines' AAR and focuses in on infantry rifle combat in Gulf War II. How has it changed over the last 50 years?

1 TrackBack

Tracked: August 14, 2006 2:55 AM
Excerpt: MOLLE gear options Modular Light-weight Load Carrying Equipment (MOLLE) is a modular quick-release backpack with compartments and components that can be added or removed, plus a fighting load vest that can accept removable pockets for the Rifleman, Pis...

2 Comments

The orginal PDF can be found at:
*HERE*
it's the first report of many such

A professional assessment from Cordesman, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS):

*HERE*
it's quite extensive

IF you want a genuinely WOW weapons system, the *small diameter bomb* (SDB) is the one that astonishes me no end. It is a 250 lb bomb with the lethality of a 2000 lb bomb. Hence you can start doing things like the bastard offspring of carpet bombing and precision bombing. A B-2 is set to carry from 64 to 192-216 SDB on a single sortie - that's right, from 64 to 192-216 targets on a single sortie. An F-22 will carry up to 8.

So, let's say that this munition gives planners the ability to hit roughly 8 times as many targets per sortie as we can now. During the 1991 Gulf War each carrier hit an average of 162 targets per day. By Operation Enduring Freeedom this number has risen to roughly 700 targets per carrier per day. (*SOURCE*

This should give, approximately, up to another 8-fold increase inside of 5 years. That's right, each carrier could hit as many as 5600 targets in a day. By way of comparison, the heaviest day in Gulf II was 1,200 targets in a day. When planners spoke of shock and awe, they had originally envisioned something like hitting 10,000 targets on the first night. That may soon be possbile.

Leave a comment

Here are some quick tips for adding simple Textile formatting to your comments, though you can also use proper HTML tags:

*This* puts text in bold.

_This_ puts text in italics.

bq. This "bq." at the beginning of a paragraph, flush with the left hand side and with a space after it, is the code to indent one paragraph of text as a block quote.

To add a live URL, "Text to display":http://windsofchange.net/ (no spaces between) will show up as Text to display. Always use this for links - otherwise you will screw up the columns on our main blog page.




Recent Comments
  • TM Lutas: Jobs' formula was simple enough. Passionately care about your users, read more
  • sabinesgreenp.myopenid.com: Just seeing the green community in action makes me confident read more
  • Glen Wishard: Jobs was on the losing end of competition many times, read more
  • Chris M: Thanks for the great post, Joe ... linked it on read more
  • Joe Katzman: Collect them all! Though the French would be upset about read more
  • Glen Wishard: Now all the Saudis need is a division's worth of read more
  • mark buehner: Its one thing to accept the Iranians as an ally read more
  • J Aguilar: Saudis were around here (Spain) a year ago trying the read more
  • Fred: Good point, brutality didn't work terribly well for the Russians read more
  • mark buehner: Certainly plausible but there are plenty of examples of that read more
  • Fred: They have no need to project power but have the read more
  • mark buehner: Good stuff here. The only caveat is that a nuclear read more
  • Ian C.: OK... Here's the problem. Perceived relevance. When it was 'Weapons read more
  • Marcus Vitruvius: Chris, If there were some way to do all these read more
  • Chris M: Marcus Vitruvius, I'm surprised by your comments. You're quite right, read more
The Winds Crew
Town Founder: Left-Hand Man: Other Winds Marshals
  • 'AMac', aka. Marshal Festus (AMac@...)
  • Robin "Straight Shooter" Burk
  • 'Cicero', aka. The Quiet Man (cicero@...)
  • David Blue (david.blue@...)
  • 'Lewy14', aka. Marshal Leroy (lewy14@...)
  • 'Nortius Maximus', aka. Big Tuna (nortius.maximus@...)
Other Regulars Semi-Active: Posting Affiliates Emeritus:
Winds Blogroll
Author Archives
Categories
Powered by Movable Type 4.23-en