Winds of Change.NET: Liberty. Discovery. Humanity. Victory.

Formal Affiliations
  • Anti-Idiotarian Manifesto
  • Euston Democratic Progressive Manifesto
  • Real Democracy for Iran!
  • Support Denamrk
  • Million Voices for Darfur
  • milblogs
Syndication
 Subscribe in a reader

Harry Potter & the Order of the Phoenix

| 1 Comment | 1 TrackBack

The lovely Courtney spent her Sunday the same way I did, and has some thoughts for you. Her commenters have more.

I should note that Courtney may be seeing a British subtext through American eyes here. Let me explain...

Rowlings has mined a familiar theme of the minor functionary who is able to make peoples' lives miserable, precisely because of the respect for authority and rules that exists in British culture. This is also an important subtext in private schools, where quality of leadership matters deeply (and Dumbledore types are rare). I don't think there's an intended gun control allegory here, as casting spells is what wizards naturally do. Preventing this is just one more example of educrats' denial of the students' personhood, though the danger angle adds impact. It's a story about and for teenagers, remember - politics aside, this is the way they tend to see all authority.

I must admit, however, that there were many aspects of the book that brough the back door EU power play in Britain to mind: endless petty regulation, alterations in the justice system, not to mention willful denial of the most obvious external threats.

Anyway, enough politics. Harry Potter & the Order of the Phoenix does have some good scenes, some appealing new characters, and a pacing that returns to its customary form near the end. It could have been great.

Overall, however, I was disappointed by this book, which would have been better if it had been about 150 pages shorter. It took too long to get rolling, often seemed to be foundering in meaningless sub-plots, and had a couple of connectivity glitches that caused me to flip back through its pages in puzzlement. What could have been a platform for the book's 2 most appealing characters to shine was wasted (though they do get one really good scene near the end), and the tenor never quite rises to the intended levels of either comedy or tragedy. I really liked books I-IV, but this one fell short of the mark.

It seems to me that Rowling is feeling quite as pressured as her main character these days, and that isn't a good sign. Might I suggest an author-to-author conversation with Joss Whedon (magic & monsters as an allegory for teendom, exposition through action), and J. Michael Straczynski (serious good & evil in a typically light genre, tapping rabid fans to help build the story as well as drive the market, producing to ridiculous deadlines while keeping a vision intact)?

1 TrackBack

Tracked: June 26, 2005 1:18 PM
Excerpt: The stories provide a rather detailed illustration of the many ways that one can deal with power...

1 Comment

That about sums up my reaction to this book, too.

Reminds me of the first principle of fiction: show, don't tell, character's motives etc.

Leave a comment

Here are some quick tips for adding simple Textile formatting to your comments, though you can also use proper HTML tags:

*This* puts text in bold.

_This_ puts text in italics.

bq. This "bq." at the beginning of a paragraph, flush with the left hand side and with a space after it, is the code to indent one paragraph of text as a block quote.

To add a live URL, "Text to display":http://windsofchange.net/ (no spaces between) will show up as Text to display. Always use this for links - otherwise you will screw up the columns on our main blog page.




Recent Comments
  • Joe Katzman: No, Andrew, I did not. Glad to hear it. read more
  • Joe Katzman: I didn't say it was necessarily new, though humans hadn't read more
  • Joe Katzman: I'm not so sure about the British, Grim, but characterizing read more
  • dfkling: While I tend to agree with the majority of the read more
  • Jeff Medcalf: I have several issues with this. First, I disagree with read more
  • Tim Oren: I wonder what is the correlation between countries where military read more
  • Alchemist: Good post by the way, and I largely agree with read more
  • Grim: Hm. "We would never pay bribes, which is illegal. This read more
  • Grim: Smart, yes, but what's the evidence that it's new, i.e., read more
  • Armed Liberal: I've got to dig the book out, but I think read more
  • Marcus Vitruvius: Andrew, That's not surprising. Sad, but not surprising. Of the read more
  • Andrew J. Lazarus: The vast majority of comments at that link are pro-Birther. read more
  • Silverlake Bodhisattva: Re: "I'm just asking the question": "I know those stories read more
  • mark buehner: Maybe now Conservatives will stop slurring liberals as having a read more
  • Marcus Vitruvius: Hear, hear. Schlichter nails it when he says that "I'm read more
The Winds Crew
Town Founder: Left-Hand Man: Other Winds Marshals
  • 'AMac', aka. Marshal Festus (AMac@...)
  • Robin "Straight Shooter" Burk
  • 'Cicero', aka. The Quiet Man (cicero@...)
  • David Blue (david.blue@...)
  • 'Lewy14', aka. Marshal Leroy (lewy14@...)
  • 'Nortius Maximus', aka. Big Tuna (nortius.maximus@...)
Other Regulars Semi-Active: Posting Affiliates Emeritus:
Winds Blogroll
Author Archives
Categories
Powered by Movable Type 4.23-en