Winds of Change.NET: Liberty. Discovery. Humanity. Victory.

Formal Affiliations
  • Anti-Idiotarian Manifesto
  • Euston Democratic Progressive Manifesto
  • Real Democracy for Iran!
  • Support Denamrk
  • Million Voices for Darfur
  • milblogs
Syndication
 Subscribe in a reader

Jim's Military UAV Briefing

| 8 Comments | 2 TrackBacks

"Uncle Jimbo," who blogs as part of the Madison Post, has a defense-related job in real life. He writes:

"The field of unmanned systems is one of the fastest-growing sectors of the defense industry. Not only are there UAVs flying over a large portion of the planet, but there are ground, undersea and other vehicles in the pipeline that will get operators out of even more military machines. I interviewed... a former Commander of TOPGUN who said something to me almost two years ago that blew my mind. He said the last fighter pilot has already been born. That is a concept to spin your head."

Me, I'm not so sure. Still, Jim proceeds with a fine introduction to some of the new developments in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and their ground-based counterparts. It's a field we've covered here before at Winds of Change.NET, from ScanEagles to Predators and Global Hawks, tiny Ravens, even "Throwbots." Jim's review adds a good overview - plus descriptions, links and pictures to some robot warriors you may not have sen or heard of before. Worth reading.

2 TrackBacks

Tracked: June 2, 2005 11:51 AM
Some Suggested Reading from The Laughing Wolf
Excerpt: Cicero has two good thought pieces here and here. Robin Burk has good pieces on the EU Constitution here and here, along with a very interesting report on an embed here. Good info on UAVs can be found here. Finally,...
Tracked: August 20, 2005 4:03 AM
Robotic Exoskeletons from Bank Locater
Excerpt: Scientists in Japan have developed robotic exoskeletons that create superhuman strength. I want one of these so that when I flip out, I can lift cars and beat up an entire precint of police officers. Read about some more productive and realistic uses...

8 Comments

the gee-whiz factor of attack drones may be entertaining --- but no one bothers to ask the question "If we are killing people in Iraq using pilotless planes controlled from well defended air bases in Nevada, aren't we legitimizing attacks against the US on its oil soil?"

You could make the same point for any projection of power we make. The ironic thing is since most of these aircraft conduct surveillance including that of our borders they make it less likely someone else can do it to us. The Coast Guard has a program called Deepwater which will use UAVs in conjunction with other surveillance aircraft to actually patrol our borders for a change.

Cordially,

Uncle J

Military Matters

The issue with UAV systems comes farther down the line, when the USG has a large number of weapons systems controlled by relatively few humans. At that point it will be easier for a tyranny to use those weapons against the domestic population.

Uncle J. is correct about the predominantly surveillance and reconnaisance use of UAVs at this point.

There are a whole slew of implications in these technologies, and more in the upcoming truly autonomous robotic capabilities under development.

I think the fellow is right to say that we will not need, or want, fighter pilots much longer. One of the big limiting factors on performance of such craft is the human pilot -- the g-forces acting on the craft reach human limits far sooner than they reach the limits of modern metals or ceramics.

Once virtual control mechanisms are good enough, the man can sit safely at home and let the plane take all the g-force. That kind of a plane will be far more dangerous in air superiority contests than any manned aircraft.

Hmmmm.

Ok now here's a question.

When will television wake up to the entertainment possibilities of armed UAVs? Now there were some shows, like Robot Wars, that were ok, but essentially boring.

Now let's take military class armed UAVs, make a sports league that incorporates them and then televise real time battles between teams. You could even borrow several concepts from FPS games such as Capture the Flag, etc etc etc.

What's the most exciting stuff on Discovery or the History channel? Things blowing up. What's the most exciting stuff in sports? Teams struggling against each other for the win.

What could be more exciting than watching people struggle to win while blowing each other up?

Quote:
"If we are killing people in Iraq using pilotless planes controlled from well defended air bases in Nevada, aren't we legitimizing attacks against the US on its oil soil?"

I think that question was answered on 9/11 at the Pentagon. The attacks on our soil have already occurred. The means of fighting this fight are all fair on our side. We follow the rules and customs of War. It matters not if the trigger-puller is 1 foot or 12,000 miles from the target. Lawful justification for the pulling of the trigger is what matters.

It will be interesting to see what happens if we ever have to fight an adversary with enough technological capability to give us a run for the money in electronic warfare and jam all these wonderful gadgets.

The wonders of the Mark I eyeball may return.

Leave a comment

Here are some quick tips for adding simple Textile formatting to your comments, though you can also use proper HTML tags:

*This* puts text in bold.

_This_ puts text in italics.

bq. This "bq." at the beginning of a paragraph, flush with the left hand side and with a space after it, is the code to indent one paragraph of text as a block quote.

To add a live URL, "Text to display":http://windsofchange.net/ (no spaces between) will show up as Text to display. Always use this for links - otherwise you will screw up the columns on our main blog page.




Recent Comments
  • Armed Liberal: As opposed, of course, to today's Michael Mann quote: Who read more
  • Chris: You are aware that the same person whose "peer reviewed" read more
  • Armed Liberal: Chris, if you think there are no experiments in evolutionary read more
  • The Great Satan: You are aware that the same person whose "peer reviewed" read more
  • Chris: Oh, and one more thing, GS - about the surface read more
  • Chris: Wow, GS, seem to have touched a nerve. Let me read more
  • Chris: Chris, if you're thinking that AGW will be conclusively proved read more
  • Joe Katzman: As a basic statement of what science must be, it's read more
  • The Great Satan: Is that the NASA data that relies on the utterly read more
  • Chris: My apologies for the double post. Rubbish. Models are an read more
  • Chris: I think he means Briffa, and oh if you are read more
  • Armed Liberal: Thanks, Satan - you're 100% right. I conflated the place read more
  • The Great Satan: Re cherrypicking, check Yaffa please. Cite, link, and/or quote, read more
  • Armed Liberal: Chris, if you're thinking that AGW will be conclusively proved read more
  • Tim Oren: On a technical note, a partial alternative to total ad read more
The Winds Crew
Town Founder: Left-Hand Man: Other Winds Marshals
  • 'AMac', aka. Marshal Festus (AMac@...)
  • Robin "Straight Shooter" Burk
  • 'Cicero', aka. The Quiet Man (cicero@...)
  • David Blue (david.blue@...)
  • 'Lewy14', aka. Marshal Leroy (lewy14@...)
  • 'Nortius Maximus', aka. Big Tuna (nortius.maximus@...)
Other Regulars Semi-Active: Posting Affiliates Emeritus:
Winds Blogroll
Author Archives
Categories
Powered by Movable Type 4.23-en