|
December 30, 20052005 Year in Reviewby Dan Darling at December 30, 2005 11:48 PM
This is probably my last post before New Year's as I've been more than a little distracted over the holiday break but I noticed this article that 2005 is a good year for al-Qaeda and its allies and figured I'd post my own take on the good, the bad, and the ugly for 2005. The Good
The Bad
The Ugly
Sorry if this sounds somewhat depressing, but that's basically the year in review as I see it. A number of impressive gains have been made, but there is also a lot of work that is yet to be done in terms of dismantling the terror network that attacked us on 9/11, not all of which can be accomplished by the US alone. Feel free to add anything that you think I may have missed or overlooked and I'll try to touch on it in the comments. Tracked: January 2, 2006 2:41 PM
Blog roundup for a new year from Kesher Talk
Excerpt: Lileks sums up 2005 as only he can. The first RINOs of the new year have been sighted. 2005 year in review: How's the GWOT going? Redstate.org is going to become Redstate.com. Rick in NYC has a great list of...
Comments
I would completely disagree that 2005 was a good year for terrorism. They watched continued progress and political achievements in Iraq and Afghanistan, watched Europe pass a host of anti-terrorism legislation, watched large protests in Morocco and Jordan against al Qaeda, watched aggressive U.S. humanitarian efforts in Indonesia and Pakistan that subsequently led to a shift in views about the U.S. and al Qaeda, watched hundreds of operatives around the world arrested or killed in places like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, and they pulled off a few major attacks, most notably the one in London that the media has fought so hard to disassociate with al Qaeda. And they are "winning?" I think not. In the article it says: Summing up 2005, Robert Ayers, a security expert for the London-based think tank Chatham House, described it as a victory for terror groups over democracy. "I think it is a win for the terrorists," Mr Ayers said. "We are seeing democratic governments becoming increasingly non-democratic with regard to their people and their response to terrorism," he said. Sorry, but the terrorists don't win by advocating vigilant counterterrorism methods...they win when they flatten London, Paris or New York. They win when nations in the west adjust their policys to appease or disengage from the fight. They win where democracy and transparency fail. They win when western socities conclude that oppressive dictators who sponsor terrorism and yearn for weapons of mass destruction are to no longer be held to account. They win when the west is forced to retreat from the Middle East and they can isolate and destroy moderate Muslims on the path to restoring the Caliphate. 2005 has not been a good year for terrorism or al Qaeda. Furthermore, the notion that more attacks or body counts are the defining factors in success or not is flawed. I can say with a fair degree of certainty that attacks by German soldiers against U.S. soldiers increased a thousand fold following 6 June 1944. Based on the above logic, D-Day was a failure because it led to more attacks against U.S. troops and more casualties at the hands of the Germans. Obviously the lesson here is that violence and death may indeed increase when you move into the lair of your enemy and take the fight straight to him. Chamberlain's policys in the 1930s were declared a success and resulted in no immediate increase of death or violence, yet they would soon be brutally exposed and in fact result in many more deaths. Al Qaeda is fighting for their lives in Iraq and Afghanistan. I doubt terrorist groups are as optimistic about their year as Robert Ayers is.
#2 from David Blue at 1:13 pm on Dec 31, 2005
Happy New Year!!!!!! C.S. Scott: Well I disagree with some of the conclusions of the article as well which is why I noted the progress in Iraq and Afghanistan in my own round-up. Protests in Jordan and Morocco don't represent much of a change in the status quo because neither country struck me as terribly on-board for al-Qaeda's program to begin with. In retrospect, I should have noted the role of the Indonesian tsunami relief in making a major improvement in public opinion there, though I'm still waiting to hear more results on the role of humanitarian assistance in improving the US in Pakistan, or rather causing other groups like the LeT's NGO wing Markaz ud-Dawaa wal Irshad to lose support. Definitely agree that the amount people that they are able to kill is not a valid means of determining whether or not the group has had a good year.
#4 from celebrim at 9:04 pm on Dec 31, 2005
"Sorry, but the terrorists don't win by advocating vigilant counterterrorism methods...they win when they flatten London, Paris or New York." My problem with so many of the analysts is that they argue that the terrorists win when the West fights back, and they argue that the terrorists win when the West doesn't fight back. My observation is that the terrorists cannot win. If we defeat them as we have been defeating them, they will lose. If they turn the West against Islam, they will lose and the terror of it will be a memory for as long as the human race exists. That may not be victory for us, but it certainly won't be victory for them. Even if they win and the West fades away, they will lose because thier vision for the future is defeat for themselves as much as anyone. Only in losing can they have a hope of winning, and the for the terrorists themselves there is nothing.
#5 from Beard at 12:14 am on Jan 01, 2006
The useful evidence that we are winning is the extent to which the local population is providing more useful intelligence to catch the terrorists. That is, do they perceive the insurgents as a threat to their own safety and welfare, and do they trust the US-backed authorities enough to turn them in? When we catch and/or kill terrorists, it means something, but not all that much. The real measure is when the local people oppose them and support the side we support. The terrorists claim that US troops are invaders, and the government we support is our puppet. We claim that we are there to help them be free. The question is, who do the local people believe? If they believe us in increasing numbers, we are making progress. Otherwise, not. This is why Abu Ghraib was such a disaster for us, while the wedding bombing in Jordan was such a disaster for them. So, the relevant statistic is not how many people we succeed in killing. It's what sort of support are we getting from the ordinary people in Iraq. How is that going?
#6 from Rob at 11:15 am on Jan 01, 2006
2005, a good year in a continuing fight against Al Qaeda; with impressive responces by the US military world wide. But I would note the battle also takes place at other levels and Al Qaeda has goals that involve media and religious campaigns that are talking to audiences that have nothing to do with us in the West. The terrorism of Al Qaeda is designed to break the will of those resisting Islamic extremism and also gather and indoctrinate more jehadis to their cause. Given what happened in Spain, where the Madrid bombing tipped an election and destroyed Spanish support for our efforts in Iraq, and London, where local suicide bombers were recruited and attacked their own country, clearly Al Qaeda has had some success. In this alternate battle, our own media serves often as a tool of Al Qaeda; amplifying the effects of the terror bombings and crying out against any action on our part in responce. So, while moderate Islam, seeks the courage to confront and control the killers in their own midst; we in the West must deal with a political, academic, media faction that is near suicidal in its own actions and world view. We have done well, in a tough and complex battle. Courage, friends and heros are key. We have plenty of all these and need to see and hear more about that in the coming year.
#7 from Colin at 5:41 pm on Jan 01, 2006
I think Putin will feature heavily in 2006. We have Russia and the Belarussian elections, Russia and Ukrainian gas supplies, and Russia and Iranian nuclear processing, not to mention Russia's presidency of the G8.
Post a comment
Here are some quick tips for adding simple Textile formatting to your comments, though you can also use proper HTML tags: |
You're Reading an Individual Post!
If you want to head to the main blog page, just follow the "Main" link in the navigation up top underneath our blog's name. Or click here:
Winds of Change.NET Home
Winds of Change Library
Support VictoryPAC
Recent Entries
· Go Read Sully on Palin.
· McCain's VP...In Which I Find Myself In SHocking Agreement With Jimbo and Ann Althouse · A Completely Non-Hostile Question About Liberal v. Conservative Thought · WGN On The Air · ABC And The Brown Palace - The Brown Palace's Side · Blackwater, Again · Department of Hmmmmm.... (Economics News) · Hillary's Speech · What Really Happened In Ossetia? · Silencing Citizens Should Concern Us All · Blackwater Pix · Some Election Links · Slate Strikes Again · The Problem With Journalists · Timetables
Support Winds of Change.NET!
Your support & assistance is greatly appreciated, and makes a difference!
The Winds Crew:
Town Founder: Joe Katzman joe {at} windsofchange. net Joe's Normblog Interview Left-Hand Man: Marc 'Armed Liberal' Danziger armed {at} windsofchange. net A.L.'s Normblog Interview Other Winds Marshals 'AMac', aka. Marshal Festus (AMac@...) Robin "Straight Shooter" Burk 'Cicero', aka. The Quiet Man (cicero@...) David Blue (david.blue@...) 'Lewy14', aka. Marshal Leroy (lewy14@...) 'Nortius Maximus', aka. Big Tuna (nortius.maximus@...) Other Regulars 'Callimachus' (callimachus@...) 'Demosophist' (demosophist@...) Rev./Maj. Donald Sensing 'Molon Labe' (molon.labe@...) 'Neo Neo-Con' Tarek Heggy (tarek@...) Semi-Active: Arthur Chrenkoff 'Gabriel Gonzalez' (in Paris) Tim Oren (tim@...) Trent Telenko (trent@...) Posting Affiliates Athena: Terrorism Unveiled Chester: The Adventures of Chester Dave Schuler: The Glittering Eye Grim: Grim's Lair et. al. Joel Gaines [Russia] Michael Totten MILblogging.com: The MilBlogs directory Murdoc [Military] Situational Awareness team [Military] Nathan Hamm [Central Asia] Randy Paul [Latin America] Robert Koehler [Koreas] Robi Sen [India & S. Asia] Nitin Pai [India & S. Asia] Simon [China & E. Asia] Yehudit: Kesher Talk Regular Topic Briefings: Andrew Olmsted [Iraq Weekly] Joel Gaines [Iraq Weekly] Security Watchtower [GWoT Mon.] Peace Like A River [GWoT Mon.] Colt [GWoT Thu.] John Atkinson [Alternative Energy] Peter Wolfgang [Alternative Energy] Omri Ceren [Hatewatch] Emeritus: Adil Farooq (adil@...) Celeste Bilby (celeste@...) Dan Darling Gary Farber (gary@...) Hossein Derakhshan (hoder@...) T.L. James (tljames@...) Robin Burk (robin@...)
Winds of Change.NET Blogkids & Affiliates
· The Argus: covering Central Asia · Canis Iratus: Glen Wishard · Correct-Amundo: Tech & society · Discarded Lies: Ev & Zorkie · The Flying Kiwi: Donovan Janus · The Glittering Eye: Dave Schuler · Gumptionology: Nortius Maximus · Hot Needle of Inquiry: 'Jinnderella' · Laughing Wolf: C. Blake Powers · Out The Mazoo: 'Mazoo' · Power and Control: M. Simon · Praktike's Place: 'Praktike' · Random Probabilities: Robin Burk · Siberian Light: covering Russia · The Spirit of Man · Good News From the Front · WATCH/: covering the war on terror
Archives By Category
-FEATURES: 48 Ways to Wisdom (24)
-FEATURES: Diaries & Roundups (10) -FEATURES: Military Transformation Uplink (12) -FEATURES: New Energy Currents (20) -FEATURES: Reader Highlights (2) -FEATURES: Regional Briefings (166) -FEATURES: Sufi Wisdom (158) -FEATURES: The Bard's Breath (32) -FEATURES: Winds of Discovery (6) -FEATURES: Winds of War [WoT] (445) 4 HA: 4th-Gen Warfare (103) 4 HA: al-Qaeda (159) 4 HA: Crime, Organized (26) 4 HA: Evil Exists (110) 4 HA: Intelligence/Spycraft (100) 4 HA: Military (522) 4 HA: Nukes, Poisons, Germs (135) 4 HA: Statecraft (29) 4 HA: War on Terror articles (706) Best Of... (179) BIZ: Business & Organizations (132) BIZ: Economics (97) BIZ: Energy (72) CIVIS (231) CIVIS: Copyright Wars (25) CIVIS: Drug Wars (18) CIVIS: Edu-Kooks (76) CIVIS: Free Societies (291) CIVIS: Hall of Shame (162) CIVIS: Hatred Rising (114) CIVIS: Journalism & Media (405) CIVIS: Spirit of America.NET (31) CIVIS: War Within the West (309) COLUMNISTS: M. Simon (13) COLUMNISTS: Tarek Heggy (33) GEO: Afghanistan (78) GEO: Africa (104) GEO: Asia (116) GEO: Aussies & Kiwis (20) GEO: Canada (68) GEO: China (86) GEO: Europe (180) GEO: France (71) GEO: India-Pakistan (112) GEO: Iran (223) GEO: Iraq (962) GEO: Israel (247) GEO: Koreas (64) GEO: Latin America (63) GEO: Middle East (255) GEO: Russia (78) GEO: Saudi Arabia (64) GEO: Sudan (36) GEO: U.K. (70) GEO: U.N. (60) GEO: U.S. of A (502) HUMANITY (88) HUMANITY: Art & Culture (159) HUMANITY: Art - Music (32) HUMANITY: Art - Poetry (6) HUMANITY: Christianity (52) HUMANITY: Heroes & Achievements (229) HUMANITY: History (125) HUMANITY: Islam (182) HUMANITY: Judaism (136) HUMANITY: Love (32) HUMANITY: Philosophy (49) HUMANITY: Spirituality & Religion (72) HUMANITY: Zen & Buddhism (28) Humour (195) Misc. (42) NET: Blogosphere (395) NET: Cyber-Security (16) NET: Grid Computing (3) NET: Spam (24) NET: The Internet (36) NET: The Open Source Meme (17) Personal (191) SCI-TECH: Biotech & Medical (83) SCI-TECH: Eco-tech (81) SCI-TECH: Nanotech (27) SCI-TECH: Science (111) SCI-TECH: Space (75) SCI-TECH: Technology (144) SPORTS (45) SPORTS: Baseball (75) Trends (64) USA: America Catch-all (19) USA: Anti-Americanism (6) USA: California Politics (7) USA: Conservatives & GOP (34) USA: Dem Party Renewal (72) USA: Domestic Issues (51) USA: Elections (92) USA: Grand Strategy (15) USA: Homeland Security (106) VictoryPAC (3) Winds of Change.NET (51)
Archives by Date
August 2008
July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 Joe's Old Archives, By Title: April - June 2002 July - December 2002
Winds Blogroll
Top Prospects
Support VictoryPACSP Normblog (LHP) SP Solomonia (RHP) RF Mader Blog CF Donklephant LF Harry's Place C Critical Mass 1B Tigerhawk 2B Gideon's Blog SS Alexander the Average 3B Democracy Arsenal UT INF Pundita DH Counterterrorism Blog PEN Liberals Against Terrorism CL Gates of Vienna MASCOT Huffington's Toast MGR Robert Tagorda GM Conservative Grapevine Humour Blogs · Cox & Forkum (cartoons) · Day By Day (cartoons) · User Friendly (cartoons) · AllahPundit (satire) · Scrappleface (satire) Religious Blogs · Conscientia (baha'i) · Unlearned Hand (bud) · Eve Tushnet (cath) · Muslim Under Progress (isl) · Ideofact (isl) · Kesher Talk (jew) · Rabbi Lazer Brody (jew) · Rishon Rishon (jew) · Rev. Donald Sensing (prot) Other Team Memberships · Command Post [All] · No End But Victory [All] · AlwaysOn [JK] Blog Services · NZ Bear's Ecosystem · Blogstreet · Daypop Top 40 · Technorati · Movable Type.org · Write A Better Blog More entries coming! |
http://www.windsofchange.net/windsopcentre-cms/trackback.cgi/5653
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference
"2005 Year in Review"