Winds of Change.NET: Liberty. Discovery. Humanity. Victory.

Formal Affiliations
  • Anti-Idiotarian Manifesto
  • Euston Democratic Progressive Manifesto
  • Real Democracy for Iran!
  • Support Denamrk
  • Million Voices for Darfur
  • milblogs
Syndication
 Subscribe in a reader

A Tougher Peace Corps?

| 6 Comments

"Post-war pacification in Afghanistan and Iraq is a tough job, but somebody's got to do it. So the question is, who?"

Thus begins a very interesting column by Jay Bryant of The Optimate. He has some suggestions regarding the Peace Corps, suggestions that are apparently under serious consideration in Washington. In fact, this proposed model has already been used successfully. Where, and by whom? You'll never guess...

UPDATE: Unfortunately, The Optimate has gone dark. Fortunately, Exit Zero included this excerpt as part of their own coverage after reading this piece:

We need a force of humanitarian workers who will advance American foreign policy by performing genuine humanitarian service. There is no reason why there should be any conflict between the two. Siegel likens the relationship to that between wartime Iraqi military units and their embedded reporters. Both had jobs to do, and did them while establishing good working relationships that, in most cases, increased respect for each side among the other.

One interesting precedent for hardened, policy-driven humanitarian workers, explained to me by a retired US Army Colonel, comes from an unlikely place - Cuba. The Cubans went into places like Angola with doctors and nurses, well-diggers, teachers, axes, shovels, raw lumber and construction equipment and actually did some good for people while measurably advancing the foreign policy objectives of their homeland.

Of course, those well-diggers, teachers, et. al. had military training and were armed; more than a few held positions in Cuba's intelligence or internal security apparatus. They were also accompanied in the field by Cuban troops.

International NGOs have shown very clearly that they will not take casualties in order to perform their work, and at the same time will not accept military protection. This makes them essentially useless in any conflict situation. Many are also politically motivated to actively undermine US efforts, not to mention their efforts to justly earn their high-living "Toyota Taliban" nickname.

Something better will be required, and the NATO "Provincial Reconstruction Teams" approach in Afghanistan is a first step toward that something. The fact that the full alternative model we need comes from the brutal tyrant and darling of the international NGO set Fidel Castro is just an additional irony.

6 Comments

sounds about right to me.

Good idea, except for one thing: The Peace Corps has a different mission and it has been enormously successful at achieving it. We don't need to mess with that success in any way.

If we want to do the things mentioned in this article, we should probably start by building a new organization from the ground up. The thing he's talking about is much more hardcore and dangerous ... something more akin to the Crisis Corps, which is a program for returned Peace Corps volunteers. That kind of idea could be extended or expanded without hurting the existing Peace Corps.

The cultural change in the Peace Corps would be practically impossible to achieve for the new mission.

Full disclosure: I was in the Peace Corps from 1993-95.

Alrighty then. Finally a glimmer of hope from the opposition. First, kudos to WoC!

It has always bothered me that we were unable to get more support from the rest of the world. Why!? It couldn't be that they are against us, could it? It certainly seems so. But perhaps this was really caused by Bush's blustery, thumb-our-noses, prove a point politics - or that posture of his staff.

Read this from Sen. Joseph Biden. Excellent speech. He will be on C-SPAN at 8pm EST tonight, with a Q&A that's worthwhile.

http://biden.senate.gov/pressapp/record.cfm?id=207000

Rereading, I really like the idea of Civic Action Teams. I'd sign up.

Tougher Peace Corps? It ain't going to happen. Another org possibly but the the Peace Corps.

Post War Pacification is being done by an RPCV. Mercy Corps was funded by A.I.D.(large cash start-up and yearly payments)and began with an Afghan focus. The RPCV also worked for NPR at the time and she has since gone global with the organization. It interesting to see the Morrocco connections(RPCVs,Kerry's Foreign Policy Advisor,etc)in the organization. Its too bad that we are treating the Afghans like this, but Mercy corps did get millions.

Leave a comment

Here are some quick tips for adding simple Textile formatting to your comments, though you can also use proper HTML tags:

*This* puts text in bold.

_This_ puts text in italics.

bq. This "bq." at the beginning of a paragraph, flush with the left hand side and with a space after it, is the code to indent one paragraph of text as a block quote.

To add a live URL, "Text to display":http://windsofchange.net/ (no spaces between) will show up as Text to display. Always use this for links - otherwise you will screw up the columns on our main blog page.




Recent Comments
  • TM Lutas: Jobs' formula was simple enough. Passionately care about your users, read more
  • sabinesgreenp.myopenid.com: Just seeing the green community in action makes me confident read more
  • Glen Wishard: Jobs was on the losing end of competition many times, read more
  • Chris M: Thanks for the great post, Joe ... linked it on read more
  • Joe Katzman: Collect them all! Though the French would be upset about read more
  • Glen Wishard: Now all the Saudis need is a division's worth of read more
  • mark buehner: Its one thing to accept the Iranians as an ally read more
  • J Aguilar: Saudis were around here (Spain) a year ago trying the read more
  • Fred: Good point, brutality didn't work terribly well for the Russians read more
  • mark buehner: Certainly plausible but there are plenty of examples of that read more
  • Fred: They have no need to project power but have the read more
  • mark buehner: Good stuff here. The only caveat is that a nuclear read more
  • Ian C.: OK... Here's the problem. Perceived relevance. When it was 'Weapons read more
  • Marcus Vitruvius: Chris, If there were some way to do all these read more
  • Chris M: Marcus Vitruvius, I'm surprised by your comments. You're quite right, read more
The Winds Crew
Town Founder: Left-Hand Man: Other Winds Marshals
  • 'AMac', aka. Marshal Festus (AMac@...)
  • Robin "Straight Shooter" Burk
  • 'Cicero', aka. The Quiet Man (cicero@...)
  • David Blue (david.blue@...)
  • 'Lewy14', aka. Marshal Leroy (lewy14@...)
  • 'Nortius Maximus', aka. Big Tuna (nortius.maximus@...)
Other Regulars Semi-Active: Posting Affiliates Emeritus:
Winds Blogroll
Author Archives
Categories
Powered by Movable Type 4.23-en