Winds of Change.NET: Liberty. Discovery. Humanity. Victory.

Formal Affiliations
  • Anti-Idiotarian Manifesto
  • Euston Democratic Progressive Manifesto
  • Real Democracy for Iran!
  • Support Denamrk
  • Million Voices for Darfur
  • milblogs
Syndication
 Subscribe in a reader

"Abhorrent response"

| 5 Comments
Lubna Hussain writes in the Arab News of the Pope's speech and Muslims' response. Benedict's remarks were "irresponsible."

[A]s tension soared over Pope Benedict XVI’s speech it became patently obvious that the pontiff must have been aware of the incendiary potential of his irresponsible remarks well before he made them. To patronize the collective intelligence of the entire Muslim community by pretending that he “was trying to cultivate an attitude of dialogue and respect” (!) toward us by denigrating our Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) served only to add insult to injury.

The Muslim violence that followed was "abhorrent."

... It is nothing short of sickening that they continue to commit atrocities in the name of a religion whose very essence is underpinned by tolerance and peace.

It is tragic that we lose our power to reason and allow emotions to dictate our response whenever a situation like this arises. Instead of referring to the teachings of the Qur’an and the Prophet (peace be upon him) a few deviants take it upon themselves to perform atrocities and injustices in the name of Islam.
...

It is therefore nothing short of pathetic to watch the mob mentality of some Muslims who, instead of extending this message of peace to the outside world, show a very ugly face when they burn effigies of the pope and attack the lives and property of innocents. Who can blame those who have no understanding of Islam if they cannot see the beauty of the religion through this shameful veneer inspired by hatred and intolerance? We have lived peacefully with Christians and Jews for hundreds of years.

... We have the right to be offended by the ill-advised speech of the pope, but Islam is greater than that and the character of the Prophet (peace be upon him) will never be diminished by the words of anyone.
...

Let’s not forget that we too have been guilty of engaging in rhetoric that has been equally inflammatory and counter-productive. As Muslims we must accept that the Pope made a mistake and has apologized. This should be accepted in good faith. The Prophet (peace be upon him) said that the best amongst us is the one who forgives. If we are true Muslims (and let’s face it, how many of us are?) we should show that actions speak louder than words. It is in our hands to demonstrate to the world the true message of our religion rather than use such opportunities to vindicate the negative stereotype that is all too prevalent in the West.

A welcome view.

5 Comments

So I wonder how long until some imam declares a fatwa against Lubna?

We have lived peacefully with Christians and Jews for hundreds of years.

I don't want to take the wind out of Hussain's sails, but where did this 100s of years of peaceful coexistence take place? And was that only when Jews and Christians were dhimmis? I.e., totally subservient to Muslim masters? (And, just because I think they are people, as well, what about the millions of Hindus slaughtered during the Muslim conquest of India....)

I find it interesting that it is the most radical Muslims who are demonstrating and commiting acts of violence in response to the Pope's quote, yet it is precicely those radicals who have least objection to spreading Islam "by the sword". Are they objecting to what seems to what now seems to be a pretty accurate point made by an Eastern Roman emperor?

Also, I find it interesting that the emperor Manuel objected to these features in Islam at the tail end of its so called "Golden Age" of tolerance, cosmopolitanism, and rationality. The Byzantines may not have had highly developed technology, yet they DID have a highly capable diplomatic and spy service. An Islamic power was the existential threat at the time, and through war and trade the Byzantines have had centuries of knowledge of Muslim doctrine and practice. Manuel's objection didn't come from ignorance of Islam, or colored by its civilizational collapse (as in our era).

I'm remembering that Lubya is one of the 3,000 Princes and Princesses that abound in Saudi Arabia. She seems to run about 50/50 between sheer ranting whacko victimhood, and deliberate thoughtful messages that make you think, "I could borrow a cup of sugar and be a neighbor to this woman."

This current piece is so moderate and sensible I'm thinking it's probably the Official Voice of the Saudi Republic and was carefully crafted by who-knows-how-many Indian editors.

"We have lived peacefully with Christians and Jews for hundreds of years."

Please remind me, how many Jews are there living in Saudi Arabia these days?

Leave a comment

Here are some quick tips for adding simple Textile formatting to your comments, though you can also use proper HTML tags:

*This* puts text in bold.

_This_ puts text in italics.

bq. This "bq." at the beginning of a paragraph, flush with the left hand side and with a space after it, is the code to indent one paragraph of text as a block quote.

To add a live URL, "Text to display":http://windsofchange.net/ (no spaces between) will show up as Text to display. Always use this for links - otherwise you will screw up the columns on our main blog page.




Recent Comments
  • TM Lutas: Jobs' formula was simple enough. Passionately care about your users, read more
  • sabinesgreenp.myopenid.com: Just seeing the green community in action makes me confident read more
  • Glen Wishard: Jobs was on the losing end of competition many times, read more
  • Chris M: Thanks for the great post, Joe ... linked it on read more
  • Joe Katzman: Collect them all! Though the French would be upset about read more
  • Glen Wishard: Now all the Saudis need is a division's worth of read more
  • mark buehner: Its one thing to accept the Iranians as an ally read more
  • J Aguilar: Saudis were around here (Spain) a year ago trying the read more
  • Fred: Good point, brutality didn't work terribly well for the Russians read more
  • mark buehner: Certainly plausible but there are plenty of examples of that read more
  • Fred: They have no need to project power but have the read more
  • mark buehner: Good stuff here. The only caveat is that a nuclear read more
  • Ian C.: OK... Here's the problem. Perceived relevance. When it was 'Weapons read more
  • Marcus Vitruvius: Chris, If there were some way to do all these read more
  • Chris M: Marcus Vitruvius, I'm surprised by your comments. You're quite right, read more
The Winds Crew
Town Founder: Left-Hand Man: Other Winds Marshals
  • 'AMac', aka. Marshal Festus (AMac@...)
  • Robin "Straight Shooter" Burk
  • 'Cicero', aka. The Quiet Man (cicero@...)
  • David Blue (david.blue@...)
  • 'Lewy14', aka. Marshal Leroy (lewy14@...)
  • 'Nortius Maximus', aka. Big Tuna (nortius.maximus@...)
Other Regulars Semi-Active: Posting Affiliates Emeritus:
Winds Blogroll
Author Archives
Categories
Powered by Movable Type 4.23-en