Bill Whittle writes an essay about America facing up to its power in the world. He's on his game again, which means it rocks. I figured that most of you have read it already, but if not then what are you waiting for?
bq. "I've been thinking about Power. Thinking about what real power entails, and more importantly, wondering if there is a way to defeat that ancient and highly reliable adage and perhaps find a way for a nation – mine -- to wield power, enormous power, without being corrupted -- enormously."
Good luck on your speaking tour, Bill!
Joe! KUDOS for posting the link here and on ComPo. I noticed that a 'regular' on ComPo gave it a thumbs up, and I read the damned thing this AM. Early. I went back this evening, and it was even better the second time around. THANKS!
Joe,
I read this piece and I have to say, there is nothing here to recommend it. Mr. Whittle may be a fine writer but his basic analysis is flawed beyond redemption. He lines up the strawmen and knocks them down. Pretty boilerplate. Does anyone really believe Noam Chomsky speaks for the majority of people who opposed this war? Please. It is possible to reject the radical anti-americanism of Chomsky and still be against this war. Also, being against the war in Iraq does not mean you are against the war on terror. Why is that so hard to understand?
The truth is, it isn't. It's a rhetorical device used by the pro-war crowd to limit debate and otherwise discredit their critics. As to the moral superiority of the United States, please tell that to those Nuns in Guatemala, the people of East Timor, those who had relatives disappear under the ruthless dictatorship of Gen. Pinochet in Chile. This country has backed dictatorships and continues to do so in spite of the newfound love of human rights by the right. Pointing out the inconsistencies of that "moral" argument shouldn't make me a traitor either. It's part of our history and unless we truly embrace the essence of the argument, the moral projection of power, and are willing to apply it in places other than Iraq, then we are being dishonest.
I would bet 'ol Sam Clements is rolling over in his grave right about now too. He was not the kind of man that would allow himself to be used as a propaganda tool for an iffy and vaguely justified military adventure. If he were alive, do you think he would be a supporter of this war?
I don't.
Nick Foresta
Read Bill Whittle. Then, if you still feel inclined, come back and read Nick Foresta. I think Nick's way off base here, but no point going into the detailed argument when a simple juxtaposition will do.