Winds of Change.NET: Liberty. Discovery. Humanity. Victory.

Formal Affiliations
  • Anti-Idiotarian Manifesto
  • Euston Democratic Progressive Manifesto
  • Real Democracy for Iran!
  • Support Denamrk
  • Million Voices for Darfur
  • milblogs
Syndication
 Subscribe in a reader

Hillary's Speech

| 9 Comments

In a hotel watching TV. Hillary's going on stage...

...admit it. You want her to tell her supporters to cut loose, mount a coup and force a vote tomorrow. A little real history at one of these freeze-dried conventions...

Update: You know she's actually giving a stemwinder of a speech...

9 Comments

The "my mother / my daughter / Harriet Tubman" piece was probably the single best speech she's ever given. The boilerplate all around it wasn't very impressive, but that was the best I've ever seen the lady.

They'll miss her after tonight.

They'll miss her after tonight.

They're going to wish they'd missed her tonight, too.

This kind of thing is no-win. If she sucked, it would look like she was too tepid for Obama. And the more she doesn't suck, the worse it makes the Biden Blunder look.

But if I could have mind-controlled Hillary for ten seconds, I would have said: "Take a good look, little girls. This is the glass ceiling we've been telling you about."

What's a stemwinder? I've heard the term come up several times re: her speech, and I honestly don't know what it means.

"What's a stemwinder?"

A shrub-seeking missile?

"Stemwinder" is a piece of Americana -- it originated as a term of praise in the 19th century, likening someone or something to the invention of a "stem" attached to a watch in order to wind it. Previously, you'd needed a key to wind your watch.

So, in the 19th century, Americans would say of something particularly excellent that it was 'a real stem-winder.'

I'm not sure exactly when the phrase became limited to particularly rousing, powerful speeches, but I believe it was in the Progressive era, when such speeches would be delivered to small farmers and workers to gin up their emotions to get out and vote. It was an early version of the turnout concept: work people up into a frenzy about it, and they'll go vote tomorrow. It tends to emotional rhetoric rather than intellectual rhetoric because the purpose is to fire the emotions. That's not to say it's wrong, just that the point isn't to build a logical argument -- the point is to take things you already think people believe, and build an emotional fire in them about those things.

Probably the classic example in modern politics was Sen. Zell Miller's speech to the Republican National Convention in 2004. That was a classic stemwinder.

This might be folk etymology, but I always thought it related to the speech being one that "winds people up" (like a spring-powered escapement watch), rather than to the novelty and ingeniousness of the watch stem per se. As such, it'd not be a generic for niftyness, but more specific for "rousing" or "invigorating".

Folk or not, it's a pretty good reading of the term.

It wasn't all emotional rhetoric. I admit zoning off during much of it - Scots-Irish genetic defense against dunderheaded economics preached by people who have never done anything resembling work.

But I heard her admit that McCain was her friend - an exceedingly discordant note to sound in front of the Hitler-braying proggies. If she were just beating the drum she could have ignored that fact; I've seen plenty of others do it.

Thanks, all for the language lesson.

But I heard her admit that McCain was her friend - an exceedingly discordant note to sound in front of the Hitler-braying proggies.

But to hear McCain tell it, pretty much everybody's his friend.

Leave a comment

Here are some quick tips for adding simple Textile formatting to your comments, though you can also use proper HTML tags:

*This* puts text in bold.

_This_ puts text in italics.

bq. This "bq." at the beginning of a paragraph, flush with the left hand side and with a space after it, is the code to indent one paragraph of text as a block quote.

To add a live URL, "Text to display":http://windsofchange.net/ (no spaces between) will show up as Text to display. Always use this for links - otherwise you will screw up the columns on our main blog page.




Recent Comments
  • Chris: If you can point to a respectable number of examples read more
  • Armed Liberal: Chris sometimes arguing with you is like living in "The read more
  • Chris: Chris, if you think there are no experiments in evolutionary read more
  • Armed Liberal: As opposed, of course, to today's Michael Mann quote: Who read more
  • Chris: You are aware that the same person whose "peer reviewed" read more
  • Armed Liberal: Chris, if you think there are no experiments in evolutionary read more
  • The Great Satan: You are aware that the same person whose "peer reviewed" read more
  • Chris: Oh, and one more thing, GS - about the surface read more
  • Chris: Wow, GS, seem to have touched a nerve. Let me read more
  • Chris: Chris, if you're thinking that AGW will be conclusively proved read more
  • Joe Katzman: As a basic statement of what science must be, it's read more
  • The Great Satan: Is that the NASA data that relies on the utterly read more
  • Chris: My apologies for the double post. Rubbish. Models are an read more
  • Chris: I think he means Briffa, and oh if you are read more
  • Armed Liberal: Thanks, Satan - you're 100% right. I conflated the place read more
The Winds Crew
Town Founder: Left-Hand Man: Other Winds Marshals
  • 'AMac', aka. Marshal Festus (AMac@...)
  • Robin "Straight Shooter" Burk
  • 'Cicero', aka. The Quiet Man (cicero@...)
  • David Blue (david.blue@...)
  • 'Lewy14', aka. Marshal Leroy (lewy14@...)
  • 'Nortius Maximus', aka. Big Tuna (nortius.maximus@...)
Other Regulars Semi-Active: Posting Affiliates Emeritus:
Winds Blogroll
Author Archives
Categories
Powered by Movable Type 4.23-en