Winds of Change.NET: Liberty. Discovery. Humanity. Victory.

Formal Affiliations
  • Anti-Idiotarian Manifesto
  • Euston Democratic Progressive Manifesto
  • Real Democracy for Iran!
  • Support Denamrk
  • Million Voices for Darfur
  • milblogs
Syndication
 Subscribe in a reader

Jihad Revelations

| No Comments | 2 TrackBacks

I've talked before about the dangers inherent in the suicide-murder blood cult that infects today's Islamic body politic like some bizzare strain of kuru.

Further proof, if any were needed, was recently provided by Palestinian Islamic Jihad leader Ali Safuri. Here's part of his interview transcript from the American TV show PBS Frontline:

"...Atomic weapons, and if the Zionist enemy uses atomic weapons, definitely, the Zionist enemy will cease to exist and Palestinian populations will be annihilated. ... If Israel were to annihilate all the Palestinian population here with atomic weapons, Israel itself would be automatically destroyed because of the scope of the atomic destruction. So we are proud to be martyrs and that our sons from outside come and continue our journey and live in this land...."

It's one thing to argue, correctly, that Palestinians seek the destruction of Israel and not peaceful coexistence. The fact that this probably involves large-scale massacres of Israeli Jews doesn't seem to bother a lot of world "leaders" and media types, who have consistently demonstrated in recent months that Jewish life means little to them.

To them, I say: it's reality check time.

When a number of influential people in the Islamic world talk about destroying the "Zionist entity" (translation: Jewish state of Israel and its non-Arab inhabitants), Safuri's quote is what some of them anticipate. It would represent the ultimate form of cleansing in fire and sanctified martyrdom, concepts that loom large in Islamofascist religious thinking.

Q: "Are you saying, Joe, that many suicide bomber instigators see Israel's use of atomic weapons as not just acceptable, but perhaps even desirable?"

A: Some important ones do. The others are "merely" reckless and fatalistic. But the result would be the same.

Q: Aren't you being alarmist?

A: Only if I'm wrong. Think it through for yourself. Read Safuri's quote again. Then read Rafsanjani's recent remarks. Now think about the widespread glorification of people who voluntarily blow themselves up in order to kill some of their enemies, and the systematic praise by political leaders and clerics who tout them as the highest exemplars of their culture and faith. Finally, throw in an Islamic populace heavily skewed toward the teenaged years - a stage of life that is not widely recognized for thoughtful rationality.

Alarmist? You tell me.

On Friday, April 12, I wrote "Armageddon Calling" as only the third post in the history of this site. It explains what's truly at stake, and the key principles behind our coming choices, as Islamic leaders incite the attempted destruction of Israel in order to maintain their pathetic dictatorships.

Q: "That's beyond frightening. Don't the potential consequences deter them?"

A: Not so far, apparently. Doug Turnbull has done some great game theory work explaining why, and here's the ten-second summary: If they're deposed from power, they're dead anyway. Better, therefore, to "ride the tiger" of Islamic terrorism and hatred, all the while hoping it doesn't eat them. Maybe the Jews will beat them as usual, in which case they can say they tried and get on with the high life. Maybe the Americans can snatch them from the back of the tiger they've so carefully raised, before they lose control.

Or maybe not. Or maybe not. And then... and then you have to look in a Christian text for a description of what comes next.

Personally, I've had it with this evil game. The sooner the USA and others come to a similar conclusion, the better our collective odds become. Do we know exactly how to fix this? No, we don't. Isn't that scary? Yes, it is. We're all scared - and we have to start anyway. As they said in Appollo 13: "Failure is not an option."

2 TrackBacks

Tracked: June 6, 2005 6:58 PM
Special Analysis: The Bush Doctrine from Winds of Change.NET
Excerpt: Indepundit explains The Bush Doctrine in simple language. We add one key point, plus some excellent background on nuclear/WMD proliferation and the stakes involved. That isn't just the big question for America's 2004 election; it's the big question for...
Tracked: January 20, 2006 2:15 AM
Special Analysis: The Bush Doctrine from Winds of Change.NET
Excerpt: Indepundit explains The Bush Doctrine in simple language. We add one key point, plus some excellent background on nuclear/WMD proliferation and the stakes involved. That isn't just the big question for America's 2004 election; it's the big question for...

Leave a comment

Here are some quick tips for adding simple Textile formatting to your comments, though you can also use proper HTML tags:

*This* puts text in bold.

_This_ puts text in italics.

bq. This "bq." at the beginning of a paragraph, flush with the left hand side and with a space after it, is the code to indent one paragraph of text as a block quote.

To add a live URL, "Text to display":http://windsofchange.net/ (no spaces between) will show up as Text to display. Always use this for links - otherwise you will screw up the columns on our main blog page.




Recent Comments
  • TM Lutas: Jobs' formula was simple enough. Passionately care about your users, read more
  • sabinesgreenp.myopenid.com: Just seeing the green community in action makes me confident read more
  • Glen Wishard: Jobs was on the losing end of competition many times, read more
  • Chris M: Thanks for the great post, Joe ... linked it on read more
  • Joe Katzman: Collect them all! Though the French would be upset about read more
  • Glen Wishard: Now all the Saudis need is a division's worth of read more
  • mark buehner: Its one thing to accept the Iranians as an ally read more
  • J Aguilar: Saudis were around here (Spain) a year ago trying the read more
  • Fred: Good point, brutality didn't work terribly well for the Russians read more
  • mark buehner: Certainly plausible but there are plenty of examples of that read more
  • Fred: They have no need to project power but have the read more
  • mark buehner: Good stuff here. The only caveat is that a nuclear read more
  • Ian C.: OK... Here's the problem. Perceived relevance. When it was 'Weapons read more
  • Marcus Vitruvius: Chris, If there were some way to do all these read more
  • Chris M: Marcus Vitruvius, I'm surprised by your comments. You're quite right, read more
The Winds Crew
Town Founder: Left-Hand Man: Other Winds Marshals
  • 'AMac', aka. Marshal Festus (AMac@...)
  • Robin "Straight Shooter" Burk
  • 'Cicero', aka. The Quiet Man (cicero@...)
  • David Blue (david.blue@...)
  • 'Lewy14', aka. Marshal Leroy (lewy14@...)
  • 'Nortius Maximus', aka. Big Tuna (nortius.maximus@...)
Other Regulars Semi-Active: Posting Affiliates Emeritus:
Winds Blogroll
Author Archives
Categories
Powered by Movable Type 4.23-en