There have been some reports filtering through lately that North Korea may have tested an atomic weapon on Sept. 9th, the holiday that commemorates North Korea's founding. There were even some preliminary reports from Russian sources of an imminent test. Today's NY Times has more. Now there's also news of a huge explosion in Yanggang province and a mushroom cloud 3.5-4 kilometers, or 2.2-2.5 miles, in diameter that was visible from satellite on that day.
The nature of that explosion is unconfirmed at present. Even a large mushroom cloud can still be a conventional explosion. CNN is reporting that it is not a nuclear explosion, but their reasoning is odd. Mind you, it was near a known missile base so it could be a major accident. As an aside, Agence France Press reports that the explosion seems to have been larger than the massive Ryongchon train blast this April 22. That's very big indeed, as the Ryongchon photos demonstrate.
MORE UPDATES: Not big enough to show on Alaskan seismographs, though, says David Schneider-Joseph. M. Simon's new blog tells us what else to look for. Meanwhile, Trent Telenko notes:
"The blast that happened at an American solid rocket plant in the late 1980s or early 1990's was near nuclear in size and it slowed Shuttle and TitanIV launches for six months due to a lack of solid rocket motor fuel. Given what Scuds used as fuel, that mushroom cloud was likely pure poison made up of red fuming nitric acid and hydrazine."
for a quick history of the NK nuclear program, try Brit Broadcasting Conservatism. For an overall assessment of what NK is doing, Prof. Sung-Yoon Lee of the Fletcher School of Diplomacy at Tufts has some sobering thoughts.
Anyone with further links, data, or what have you, please use this comments section or email "joe" and/or "dan" here @windsofchange.net. The team will be keeping you updated as this story develops. Here's an ongoing Google News tracker, too.
NOTE: Please use the simple formatting instructions for creating live links, in order to avoid blowing up the front page template. Thanks!








Don't be surprised if South Koreans suddenly rediscover that they loves America and are our closest ally. I say, let them handle the Nut of the North. The security of the South Korean ingrates is not worth the life of one American soldier.
CNN.com is quoting an unnamed US government official saying that it is not a nuke blast. Though it's old media so that should probably be taken with a grain of salt.
At this point I'm inclined to be skeptical toward any conclusion until we get more and better information.
I found it at Captain's Quarters here - and there's also a Yahoo! story
NY Times article
SFGate.com article
CNN seems to be the only one that is reporting "not a nuke" at the moment. However, some caution is probably called for at this point, since this is breaking news, and we should all know by now how that goes. I, for one, am kind of wondering why this hasn't broken until now. If it really was a nuclear detonation, the spy satellites that the US doubtless has tasked to the area should have picked up the gamma ray flash instantly.
I'm looking forward to the comments by various officials in the morning...
Forest fire that leaves a crater, huh? My ass.
Forest fire that manages to take the form of a mushroom cloud! Yeah, right.
My money is on that it's not a nuke test. Something tells me that if it were, we'd have heard about it before now (as the explosion took place on Thursday). At this point, who the hell knows. The Unification Minister gave a briefing this afternoon here in Seoul and said for now they feel it wasn't nuclear related, although he didn't say why. Basically, everyone is rushing to confirm what was said. The S. Korean media is full of speculation -- could have been a nuke, could have been a test of some other sort, could have been a major accident, might have been nothing at all. I read reports that those living on the other side of the Sino-Korean border didn't notice anything unsual, although they did point out that a mushroom cloud might have been obscured by the mountains. Interestingly enough, the Korean press is doing a lot of regurgitation of the foreign press, i.e., "The NYT reported....," which is ironic given that it was Yonhap that broke the story. That's another thing -- the Yonhap piece quoted a "Chinese source familiar with the North Korean situation," which in Korean, could mean anything. It also quoted other sources -- all living in China -- as saying they heard "rumors" of an explosion. I'm not saying something didn't happen, but until we get a nice satellite shot or a picture of a pretty mushroom cloud, I'd be very careful with this story at the moment.
I'll try to keep things going at my blog, too. When it's working, that is.
PS: To answer your question over at my blog, I doubt these leaks of S. Korean nuclear experiments had anything to do with suspicions concerning recent N. Korean moves. Frankly, the way that whole mess is playing out in Seoul, I don't think any planning went into it. It's just a mess, and embarrassing to everyone involved. Coincidentally, the North Koreans have been exceptionally harsh on Seoul following that news, and the Unification Minister's briefing concentrated more on N. Korea's reaction to S. Korea's nuclear experiments and the way it would influence the six-party talks than on the explosion in N. Korea. In fact, he hardly said anything about the later other than "We're trying to confirm what took place," and "We don't think it was a nuke test."
Some analysis here.
Yeah. They launch their liquid-fuelled rockets from there. Big bang, big fire.
This just in -- S. Korean gov't just confirmed explosion and mushroom cloud, said it was non-nuclear. Apparently three times larger than Ryongchon. Speculation is that it was an arms depot going up, as the area has a ton of munitions factories. I wouldn't be surprised if the North KOreans tried to launch a Daepodong and things didn't quite work out as well as they planned.
I'll link when the English version comes out.
Hey, maybe some CIA guys managed to arrange a little "accident" like the stunt they pulled with the Siberian pipeline network. (snicker) That's the problem with running a corrupt totalitarian Commie government: it's difficult to sort out foreign sabotage from the background noise of mind-numbing incompetence.
(Come to think of it, it's rather difficult to do that with ANY government.)
What to look for
It will take a bigger air blast for a given seismic reaction than with an underground blast. Of course tthe wave (pulse) in the atmosphere would be larger.
Mushroom cloud means an aboveground test. Aboveground means fallout. That means that people would be picking up the radioactivity. The Japanese would have seen it first. Then US detectors, and not just government ones.
I don't think everybody could sit on the info. Plus, the Chinese would freaked out since it was right on their border.
Articles say that this was at/near a North Korean missile base. They seem to be having problems with their missile program - they got detected hiding them under concrete bags on ships, that train blew up and killed all those Syrian missile techs. And now this.
What an entirely coincidental string of bad luck for NoKo missile guys.
Joe: We have operational sensors that test for Krypton 85 emmission, those would have radically elevated readings, the Chinese have them also-- I agree with Blaster that this was prob'ly conventional, given the timing. A 'celebratory' blast. The fall-out radius combined with the date argue against an accident.
This sounds like a major communist arms depot or rocket fuel factory going up.
The Soviet North Seas fleet lost it's primary weapons storage depot in the late 1980's when some of its ammunition went up either spontaniously or through incompetence and wiped out 80% of the North Seas Fleet's ammunition.
Being as the majority of it was things like torpedos, cruise missiles, anti-aircraft missiles and rockets. The Fleet never again achieved combat readiness before the Soviet Union fell.
The blast that happened at an American solid rocket plant in the late 1980s or early 1990's was near nuclear in size and it slowed Shuttle and TitanIV launches for six months due to a lack of solid rocket motor fuel.
Given what Scuds used as fuel, that mushroom cloud was likely pure poison made up of red fuming nitric acid and hydrazine.
Help us fight injustice in Iran. Please sign our petition opposing the death penalty for minors.
http://www.petitiononline.com/coceii/petition.html
Even though this wasn't a nuclear test, the increased level of suspicious activity recently is worrying - especially as there's likely to be a lull in U.S. policy initiative towards the DPRK before November. There's a bunch of links and history at my blog .
I'm guessing this is a conventional explosion. If the DPRK were testing their nukes, it would also be a display of their official entry into the Nuclear Club. With the test would be great proclamations, grandstanding, with every horn of the regime would be trumpeting their great triumph. That would be the point of a test. We saw this sort of thing when Pakistan tested their nukes.
Instead, none of that has occurred. Just silence.
TACITUS
http://betweenhopeandfear.blogspot.com/
Joe: Colin Powell on Meet the Press just said it was conventional. I have to wonder if lil Kim intended at least his civilian pop to believe it was nuclear.
The explosion Trent mentioned in the Soviet fleet may have been the 1984 explosion at Sevoromorsk, which involved the Red Banner Northern Fleet. Something about the rocket storage (propellants), and apparently it was major enough to look as big as a nuclear explosion.
To a previous poster, it is vaguely possible for a forest fire or other large fire to form a mushroom cloud. The cloud over Oakland, CA, on Oct. 20, 1991 around 11:15 am -- just as the Oakland Hills fire was really getting under way -- did look somewhat mushroom shaped from the angle I saw it from the north west (rainbow edges, no less). Difference of course is it didn't keep that shape and quickly expanded downwind.
I've got to wonder again if they had the retired CIA 'remote viewer' on the radio again(psyops 60's)who has predicted the end of the earth from asteroids after the new shuttle program is started(post crash). He predicts big explosion on border and I'll be damned if it happens a week later. Its not the nuclear border defense,but a train full of fuel for the winter. They probably still need a replacement.
As far as seeing the future, I think the TV at the UN works better and you don't have to worry about the making sure there is a mistake(i.e.Lucifer type stuff) in time, etc.
Anyway, I thought these famous bloggers would have an answer by now...........
Joe: The Krypton 85 sensors on the borders can detect underground tests and increased uranium enrichment activity as well.
I recall reading on one of the Korean blogs that defectors have said there is a resistance movement in NoKo. Maybe they are responsible.
Witnesses in South Korea saw a huge mushroom-shaped cloud and felt tremors. A satellite showed a substantial crater in the ground. Yet Colin Powell is not sure that North Korea was testing a nuke??!
Check out my opinion of it on my blog.
Tom
Uh... nobody in South Korea saw any mushroom clouds or felt any tremors unless they were on mushrooms themselves. This story broke here in Seoul the same day it broke in the rest of the world -- five days after the explosion. In fact, they are having trouble getting witnesses from the town just across the border in China who saw a mushroom cloud.
I'm not sure which story you got that from, but when the Korean versions say the South Koreans detected a cloud, they are referring to satellite imagery and other methods, not with the naked eye.
This just in -- BBC reported that NK Foreign Minister Paek Nam-sun explained to visiting UK Foreign Office Minister Bill Rammell that the explosion was a planned demolition of a mountain linked to the planned construction of a hydroelectric power station.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3650702.stm
Nice of them to say something, at least.
How do you demolish a mountain, except with a nuke?
Immediately prior to a North Korean nuclear test would be a grand time to drop a couple or three MOABs.
I suspect a counterforce first strike.
Maybe that's just wishful thinking on my part....
Whitehall: it is. Old Persian saying: never wound a king.
South Korea is effectively complicit in propping up North Korea's regime at the moment, and will not help in any way. American troops in Korea are based in range of North Korean artillery. Worst-case planning says that a strike on North Korea = loss of those troops, and loss of any U.S. presence in Korea too. Which means a Korea that falls into China's orbit (this is China's current goal, and helps explain why they continue to be the NK regime's biggest backers - as well as why the USA hasn't just left).
Anything you do has to have an effect that justifies those potential losses, as well as the political blowback.
And now, FWIW, the North Koreans say the blast was the planned demolition of a mountain for a hydroelectric project.
Interesting comment in the story about it having a "ring of truth" to it. Last time we heard about a ring and a mountain, it was fantasy, but -- we'll see, won't we?
I don't condemn misile tests, if any by Korea, because a country has the right to make its defence stronger by inventing new misiles.
I guess there should be no objection if Korea is testing new missiles because every country has the rights to defend its territories.
China is key, literally.
http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?article_class=13&no=321523&rel_no=1