Numbers, Numbers, Numbers, Those D**n Numbersby Armed Liberal at May 9, 2008 4:19 AM
OK, a little help please. TAPPED was nice enough to link to my latest irritated screed at the media's poor coverage of military suicide rates. Once the statistic's initial shock value wears off, it's clear that--as Winds of Change notes in its calculations--the figure is fairly misleading. Taking the national rate of suicide (about 13 per 100,000) and applying it to the 1.6 million U.S. troops that have to date served, the figure comes out to 8,409 -- a little less than twice the number of U.S. casualties in Iraq. More an artifact of the comparatively low casualties the U.S. has suffered in Iraq than anything else. They then go on: The more compelling statistic is the one revealed in an independent CBS analysis last November, namely that veterans aged 20-24 (that is, those who've served in current wars) have a suicide rate up to four times higher than civilians the same age. So we go over to the CBS analysis: So CBS News did an investigation - asking all 50 states for their suicide data, based on death records, for veterans and non-veterans, dating back to 1995. Forty-five states sent what turned out to be a mountain of information. OK, I'm pretty deeply puzzled here. Back when I did my first post on suicide, here's what I found: So in 2004, there were a total of 14,328 suicides in the US in the age group 20 - 44 (the group that I think pretty well covers the population in Iraq - some are younger, some are older). the total population in 2004 in that age group was 104,259,000 - so the rate/100,000 population was 15.25. So let's go to the CDC data, and see what the numbers for ages 20 - 24 look like. They show 2,599 suicides in that age range in 2004. There are, per the census, 21.05 million Americans that age; that gives a raw rate of 12.35/100,000. Note the article states that the rate is 8.9. OK, I'm puzzled - how the heck did he get that? Now let's take a moment and sex-norm the rate, as I did in the original post. Per the census, the 20 - 24 age group has 10.86 million males, and 10.20 million females. The suicide number for males in this group was 2,105; the rate was this 20.22/100,000. For females, there were 404 suicides, for a rate of 3.96/100,000. Assuming the same ratio of males/females in the military (which is for the Army, and hence somewhat high), we have 83% male, 17% female. So sex-norming the rations, we'd get 83% * 20.22 + 17% * 3.96 for a total rate of 17.46/100,000. The actual rate, per Rathburn, is between 22.9 and 31.9/100,000. Now I'm not sure how he got such a huge variance, but I'll also suggest that the number of veterans between 20 and 24 is pretty small. The VA says there are 287,400 veterans in that age group. This would suggest that there were between 66 and 92 suicides in 2005 in this group. Let's look at the overall population. There were a total of 24.5 million vets as of 2005, and the CBS study shows 6,256 suicides in 2005, for a rate of 25.51/100,000. Assuming a sex-normed overall population, the rate (using the 83%/17% ratio, which is high, but close enough) would be 15.5/100,000. So - looks like the rate is significantly higher - which means there is some damn serious work to do. But - I'm seriously puzzled about where the doc got his statistics. I'll look for an email for him and ask him directly. Meanwhile, here are my sources: I'm open to sources. I know he's a professor of epidemiology, and I'm some guy with Excel and a web browser. But his numbers make no sense to me. Note: my son is in the military, and I'm darn concerned about his well-being. But I want to have a fact-based discussion; I don't think vaguely-sourced or wrong numbers make for good discussion. All rights reserved. This article can be found on the Internet at: Persons wishing to contact the author of this article for reprints etc. should put a request in the Comments section, or send an email to "joe", over here @windsofchange.net. |
You're Reading a Printer-Friendly Post! This page is designed for printing convenience and simplicity. It does not contain comments or other advanced features. You can click to go to the full entry "Numbers, Numbers, Numbers, Those D**n Numbers" and participate in the discussions, or head to our blog's home page to see other Winds of Change.NET articles: Persons wishing to contact the author of this article for reprints etc. should put a request in the Comments section, or send an email to "joe", over here @windsofchange.net. |