Here's an interesting transcript of Obama on Middle Eastern issues.
I'll be seeing Samantha Power tomorrow night & will have more comments then.
Here's an interesting transcript of Obama on Middle Eastern issues.
I'll be seeing Samantha Power tomorrow night & will have more comments then.
Here are some quick tips for adding simple Textile formatting to your comments, though you can also use proper HTML tags:
*This* puts text in bold.
_This_ puts text in italics.
bq. This "bq." at the beginning of a paragraph, flush with the left hand side and with a space after it, is the code to indent one paragraph of text as a block quote.
To add a live URL, "Text to display":http://windsofchange.net/ (no spaces between) will show up as Text to display. Always use this for links - otherwise you will screw up the columns on our main blog page.
(Actually the admission already has a qualifier sandwiched into it - He's retiring so it's not like he's going to be any kind of future problem and it's really silly for me to even have to mention this, isn't it? - but let's call the first one a freebie.)
Here we go:
Now that's five excuses so far, and already he's cut Israel and American Jews in for a share of the blame. And he's just warming up.
Stereotypical Jewish Liberal Guilt off the leeward bow, Captain. Shall we treble-shot the guns and lay across their stern?
That was a freebie until he repeated it.
Obama is an obfuscater - but his defense may hold up. Amidst the obfuscations and shifting of blame, one can parse a coherent defense:
Now, the second assertion re: what has been said in church is a yes/no matter of fact. If it's not true, we have a problem. Likewise, depending on the content and virulence of the pastor's comments outside the church, we may also have a problem.
Assuming that neither of those things remains a problem, we have a situation similar to Harry Truman going to Pendergast's funeral. Wherein he said:
Which I've always thought was a persuasive and even an honorable response.
Not an Obama fan - to me, he's the personification of "empty suit" - but on the merits, he may have a good case here.
Joe -
He would have a point if he left at no more than that. But he doesn't. The problem isn't that he has a personal relationship with a vicious bigot - who doesn't? - but the way he chooses to defend it, at far too great a length.
He piles on non sequiturs about how Wright works with prisoners and lectures the black community, etc., which would equally justify Obama having a relationship with Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam.
But worst of all is the way he works in the counter-accusations, and subtly plays the "Black beats Jew" trump suit. It might be entirely innocent - God knows he's innocent of so many things, like foreign policy. To me it sounds like he's closer to Wright's views than he's willing to admit openly.
Especially since he can't look the situation in the face, and hides behind weaselisms like "I have never heard anything that would suggest anti-Semitism on part of the Pastor."
Glen, I would think what you listed as Obama's #1 counts as a goddamn lie if it's not a garbled transcript. ""Most of [Wright's controversial statements] by the way are controversial directed at the African American Community and calling on them start reading books and turn off the TV set and engage in self help." That's like claiming Nixon was forced out for starting the EPA. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that nobody, anywhere, ever has objected to Jeremiah Wright saying his congregation should watch less tv.