Winds of Change.NET: Liberty. Discovery. Humanity. Victory.

Formal Affiliations
  • Anti-Idiotarian Manifesto
  • Euston Democratic Progressive Manifesto
  • Real Democracy for Iran!
  • Support Denamrk
  • Million Voices for Darfur
  • milblogs
Syndication
 Subscribe in a reader

Oliver Stone's 9/11 Movie - and Some Thoughts on Courage

| 2 Comments | 1 TrackBack

Rev. Paul W. McNellis of the fine group blog Democracy Project discusses Oliver Stone's 9/11 movie, which I've been avoiding for obvious reasons. But Stone surprised him by actually making a movie for a change. The review, worth reading in full, ends with this:

"Courage as a virtue is increasingly misunderstood in our society, especially among the keyboard class. As our lives become more comfortable and protected, we forget who does the protecting. A better understanding of this might bring solace to those family members whose lost loved ones are not explicitly mentioned in this film.

McLoughlin and Jimeno are courageous not because they survive under the rubble. They are trapped. They don't want to be there. One of them even wonders if the whole day was pointless: they saved no one. But it was their courage that put them there, back when they still had a choice. For the many who didn't survive, their "yes," their "I got it, Sarg," began when they became one of those who protect the rest of us.

By choosing a narrow focus, Mr. Stone has done well something Hollywood almost never does. He's given us a glimpse, a reminder, of people like those we all know, people living good lives by doing the little things day after day that good people do: Loving your spouse, trying to be a good parent, doing your duty. We are surrounded by such people but tend to take them for granted. Often, they're no further away from us than the next room."

Ah, Sheepdogs....

1 TrackBack

Tracked: August 24, 2006 6:18 PM
A View of Courage from MilBlogs
Excerpt: Joe Katzman at Winds of Change links to a review Oliver Stone’s new movie World Trade Center, written by Rev. Paul W. McNellis at the Democracy Project. Rev. McNellis’s review stands as an excellent essay on what constitutes courage, as...

2 Comments

AFAIK the "sheep, wolves and sheepdogs" classification is Dave Grossman's:

http://hobbes.ncsa.uiuc.edu/onsheepwolvesandsheepdogs.html

I very much enjoyed both articles referenced here. However, I tend to classify people into four broad, general groups.

Sheep
Wolves
Sheep Dogs
Wolf Hounds

The first two are the same as Whittle's. The sheep dogs and wolf hounds are where we differ. Sheep dogs protect and guide the sheep and live among the sheep. Sometimes they even look like sheep, white and cuddly, until the wolves show up.

Wolf hounds, on the other hand, never look like sheep. In fact, they more closely resemble the wolves, except for their moral devotion to the sheep. The wolf hounds do not live among the sheep, and they do not wait for the wolf to show up. Wolf hounds go out into wilderness and hunt the wolves. They prey on the predators. And for this reason they are feared, and sometimes even hated, by the ones they protect.

Leave a comment

Here are some quick tips for adding simple Textile formatting to your comments, though you can also use proper HTML tags:

*This* puts text in bold.

_This_ puts text in italics.

bq. This "bq." at the beginning of a paragraph, flush with the left hand side and with a space after it, is the code to indent one paragraph of text as a block quote.

To add a live URL, "Text to display":http://windsofchange.net/ (no spaces between) will show up as Text to display. Always use this for links - otherwise you will screw up the columns on our main blog page.




Recent Comments
  • TM Lutas: Jobs' formula was simple enough. Passionately care about your users, read more
  • sabinesgreenp.myopenid.com: Just seeing the green community in action makes me confident read more
  • Glen Wishard: Jobs was on the losing end of competition many times, read more
  • Chris M: Thanks for the great post, Joe ... linked it on read more
  • Joe Katzman: Collect them all! Though the French would be upset about read more
  • Glen Wishard: Now all the Saudis need is a division's worth of read more
  • mark buehner: Its one thing to accept the Iranians as an ally read more
  • J Aguilar: Saudis were around here (Spain) a year ago trying the read more
  • Fred: Good point, brutality didn't work terribly well for the Russians read more
  • mark buehner: Certainly plausible but there are plenty of examples of that read more
  • Fred: They have no need to project power but have the read more
  • mark buehner: Good stuff here. The only caveat is that a nuclear read more
  • Ian C.: OK... Here's the problem. Perceived relevance. When it was 'Weapons read more
  • Marcus Vitruvius: Chris, If there were some way to do all these read more
  • Chris M: Marcus Vitruvius, I'm surprised by your comments. You're quite right, read more
The Winds Crew
Town Founder: Left-Hand Man: Other Winds Marshals
  • 'AMac', aka. Marshal Festus (AMac@...)
  • Robin "Straight Shooter" Burk
  • 'Cicero', aka. The Quiet Man (cicero@...)
  • David Blue (david.blue@...)
  • 'Lewy14', aka. Marshal Leroy (lewy14@...)
  • 'Nortius Maximus', aka. Big Tuna (nortius.maximus@...)
Other Regulars Semi-Active: Posting Affiliates Emeritus:
Winds Blogroll
Author Archives
Categories
Powered by Movable Type 4.23-en