A publishing house called Fantagraphics has undertaken the ambitious project of publishing the entire run of the "Peanuts" comic strip in book form. I had seen them on the shelves, but didn't but one till they got out their fourth volume, which covers 1957 and '58.
I could tell you I preferred this one above all others because these were the years when the comic strip really gelled and the characters flowered, before they veered into excess and self-parody in the '60s. It was the period when Snoopy was still a dog, not some mythical undoglike being, and the children were still children (no psychiatrist's booth for Lucy).
I could offer all that explanation for why these years are simply the best in the strip, but I'd be lying. Fact is, when I was a little kid (mid-60s) I had a paperback book with this run of Peanuts comics in it, and so I remember them well from my own childhood, and so I am fonder of them than others. There's no crime in preferring the familiar to the less-so. The crime is in thinking it really is better based on nothing but that preference.
A nuclear annihilation gag! (Click for full strip). It never struck me as odd or creep-inducing back then.
Definitely click for full. Perfect and eerily prescient depiction of the Chomskyite Blog Troll (Fanaticus antiamericus) almost 50 years before the fact. From a series of strips where Linus decides he wants to be a "wild-eyed fanatic" when he grows up. Churchill once described a fanatic as someone who can't change the subject and won't change his mind. It works as a quip, but a true definition also would include "someone who can steer any remark into his obsession-topic in under 5 seconds."








I'd forgotten about those "wide eyed fanatic" strips... classics, without a doubt.
Oh, and the correct Churchill quote actually dovetails with your formulation better:
The capacity to steer all topics toward his/her obsession at speed is simply a corollary of the second qualification... since there IS only one subject as far as such people are concerned.
I assume they have to get permission from the copyright owner.
Absolutely, Robert. A hard-bound compilation set of every single Peanuts cartoon, ever, requires not only permission - it requires active help.
So far, they're up to about 1960. The full set would set folks back about $750 (25 x $30 each) or so, but I've no doubt that they'll find many takers.
Im quite sure the linus making clever remarks strips are from the same era as the Lucy the psychiatrist strips, and the Snoopy vs the Red Baron strips. During the 50s,when snoopy was just a dog, Linus was still portrayed as a baby with a blanket. Sally was introduced as Linus became older and more sophisticated.
I'm pretty sure the "fanatic" and "fallout" Peanuts were from the 60s (early 60s). They were very clever and very funny. Once, Linus broke a lamp, and Lucy said, "Just wait til mom hears about this." Linus paused, and then said, "Maybe I can blame it on society."
Schulz could brilliantly encapsulate a point of view in four little boxes of poorly drawn children.
If Callimachus got it from the books, its time provenance is guaranteed pre-1960 because they're only up to 1959. Otherwise, here's the descriptions available via Callimachus' links...
And...
Charles M. was a genuis, and I loved him as a kid. But since I became an adult, I've left the fold - because Calvin and Hobbes eclipsed even Charlie Brown and friends for sheer gigawatt brilliance.
I have a hard-bound collection of nine or ten volumes that have the early years. The animation is quite different, and Linus quotes the Bible a lot more frequently than in later years.
And because of Schroeder, on December 16th, I was asking a friend of mine, "What day is today? I know it's some kind of special day, but what?"
We figured it out. Beethoven's birthday.