Still Embeddedby 'Callimachus' at April 20, 2006 2:08 AM
Remember embedded reporters? Most people probably forgot about them after the fall of Baghdad. They were regarded with suspicion on the right and openly reviled on the left. But I thought they did, for the most part, a good job. Since the fall of Baghdad, I think they've done a much better job. The pell-mell chase across the desert was a difficult thing to capture in words and an easy inspiration to enthusiasm and hyperbole. Reporting on the slow grind of a fight against insurgents and terrorists, however, is exactly the kind of thing that requires close and long-term contact with the grunts. And the question of military morale is so important to the domestic debate about the war, with widely ranging estimates of where it stands, that you'd think the embedded reporters would have everyone's attention right now. You'd be wrong.... Exactly when they became useful, the big media seemed to lose interest in them. Who will give you better pictures of realities from Iraq? An embedded freelancer in Ramadi or Mosul, or a high-priced son of the First Amendment who never leaves the Green Zone except for a ride home to Manhattan? My money's on the embeds. But they rarely seem to get into print outside their hometown newspapers. I keep up with them via the occasional update wraps provided by Greyhawk and others. Recently he linked to this one, and this one, and this one, and this one. All are excellent. Just plain good reporting. Some readers will breeze by these links, thinking, "it will just be more of that phony 'good news' bullshit spun by the Pentagon" But you're wrong. Here's a random passage:We rolled out the gate and picked up our interpreters. From there, we worked our way through the checkpoints and finally found our way out past the wire and into open country. The convoy tooled over tarmac, gravel roads and finally a rutted goat path that claimed to be a road of some variety. Finally, we pulled up in front of a brand new building sitting in the middle of a broad field surrounded, at some distance, by several small villages.Now is that good news? I'd say you could read that any number of ways. You can bring your own biases to it and come away confirmed, no matter where you're coming from. Liberation, or neo-imperialism? Universal human nature, or learing to kiss up to the occupiers? Fact is, it's just plain good solid reporting. All rights reserved. This article can be found on the Internet at: Persons wishing to contact the author of this article for reprints etc. should put a request in the Comments section, or send an email to "joe", over here @windsofchange.net. |
You're Reading a Printer-Friendly Post! This page is designed for printing convenience and simplicity. It does not contain comments or other advanced features. You can click to go to the full entry "Still Embedded" and participate in the discussions, or head to our blog's home page to see other Winds of Change.NET articles: Persons wishing to contact the author of this article for reprints etc. should put a request in the Comments section, or send an email to "joe", over here @windsofchange.net. |