Gary Farber's home blog is Amygdala.
They've taken different directions, ostensibly -- and truly, in some ways, to be sure -- away from their heritage, but how far have they truly yet gone? Perhaps far, and perhaps not far enough.
In capitalistic neo-communist China:Fight The Paper Tiger! Raise High The Banner of... MTV?
Communist Party nostalgia meets Chinese teenagers.
When fathers of the Chinese Communist Party mapped out the road to socialist perfection, they didn't give much thought to green hair.
But amid growing concern that it is losing touch with an increasingly rebellious youth, the government recently announced a series of steps to bolster social, ethical and moral standards among underage Chinese.Because who doesn't love a good Youth Palace? And communism! It's so k00!"What they're really afraid of is not political dissidents. It's long hair, decadence, punks and hip-hop. That's raising more concern than anything else," said Hung Huang, publisher of the Chinese edition of Seventeen magazine. "In essence, China is experiencing its first real generation gap, and it's a 7 on the Richter scale."
Premier Wen Jiabao set the tone in late February with State Council Document #8 — cited as the most important statement on youth since the Communists swept to power in 1949 — calling on parents, teachers and the government to help strengthen and reform the virtue of Chinese minors.
The government has also banned the release of new foreign films during the school break this summer and tightened restrictions on foreign textbooks, cellphone text messaging, the Internet and racy magazines aimed at teens. It is recruiting new "upstanding youth" to serve as role models. And it is pouring money into "Youth Palaces," the national network of after-school community centers started in the 1950s to promote extracurricular activities.
[...]Between a Maoist Youth Palace, and the faux Egyptian mummy with hip-hop, the latter wins almost every time.Particularly vexing for senior party and government officials, analysts and party insiders say, is the limited traction that slogans and morality campaigns may have with a generation weaned on MTV and online games.
"The party is trying to do a little updating and repackaging," said Victor Yuan, chairman of Horizon, a market research firm that works for the government and private companies. "But compared to campaigns by professional ad people, they still fall short. Most young people would rather watch videos."
Young Chinese continue to join the Communist Party — though exact figures are unavailable, reports say the trend is up — but party stalwarts fret that they are embracing the red banner for the wrong reasons. Instead of identifying with party ideology, surveys suggest, many youngsters view the party as a networking opportunity, a sort of high-octane Rotary Club.
"I'm not interested in joining now but might consider it later," said Wu Yue, 22, a recent Beijing college graduate who is trying to break into television. "For a lot of young people, it's not an issue of believing in communism but getting good jobs, promotions and better pay, especially if you're in a political environment like government or the media."
At Vics, a trendy club in the shadow of Beijing's Worker Stadium, the focus is on parties of a different sort. At 10:30 on a weeknight, things start to hop as young Chinese amble past the faux Egyptian mummy, down the chrome stairs and onto the red luminescent dance floor to the thumping sound of rap and hip-hop. Some won't head home before 5 in the morning.
"I come here a few times a week for the music and the atmosphere," Chao Xu, a 22-year-old student, said at a table crowded with whisky bottles, soft drinks and cigarette butts. "There's concern about morality these days, but it's not a problem with any of my friends."Not after enough whisky, anyway.
That hasn't stopped the government from trying to create a "purified" living environment for teenagers and young adults in concerts and dance halls across the country. The Culture Ministry early last month approved Britney Spears' first China tour, provided she doesn't reveal too much.Whaddya rebelling against, kid? Little Red Books! I mean, whaddaya got?"Relevant departments will carry out strict reviews of Britney Spears' performance clothing," a state-run news agency said. The report followed the banning of Hong Kong pop diva Faye Wong's song "In the Name of Love" because the lyrics include the word "opium."
In May, the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television and local affiliates issued guidelines calling on TV anchors to stop dying their hair strange colors, wearing bizarre clothes, showing too much skin, using Hong Kong or Taiwan accents, displaying their navels or cleavage, and wearing plunging necklines or short skirts.
The guidelines also include calls to reduce sex and violence in prime-time programming as part of a broader "clean the screen" campaign.
Zhao Mengxin, an anchorwoman on several provincial CCTV shows, applauds the policies, especially those regulating dress.
"Local television is particularly bad, with anchors wearing vulgar, mismatched clothes that look like they grabbed them from the gutter," she said. "Being elegant is always in style, especially when young people are watching."
The crackdown on suggestive clothing may pale beside the task of reducing media violence. China, famous for its martial arts films, has a high cultural tolerance for violence, said Miao Di, a film and television professor with the Beijing Broadcasting Institute.
Several years ago, an American civic group approached Miao's school, voicing concern that violent Hollywood exports were tarnishing young Chinese people's minds.
"None of the Chinese thought the American shows were violent compared to our own homegrown programs," he said. "The Chinese people have always been very sensitive about sexuality but not that worried about violence."
Authorities are also trying to control young people's use of the Internet after a series of high-profile abuses, experts say.
"We're trying to enhance our influence over young people and promote traditional culture," said Cao Xuecheng, vice chief of the propaganda department of the China Communist Youth League.
This year, a video-game addict dropped dead, reportedly from stress and exhaustion, after playing "Legend of Mir II" for 20 hours in an Internet cafe in Chengdu. About the same time, two secondary school students in Chongqing were killed by a train when they fell asleep on railroad tracks after two days online.
In response, Beijing announced last month that it had shuttered 16,000 Internet cafes as part of a campaign to protect the nation's children and adolescents from corrosive influences — and, human rights activists say, to keep a tighter grip on free expression.
Non-regulated Internet cafes hurt the "mental health" of teenagers and interfere with their schoolwork, Culture Minister Sun Jiazheng said this year.
But there are plenty of loopholes. Ding Zheng, a Beijing high school student, stood in front of an Internet cafe on Beijing's Dong Street. "This is a joke," he said, pointing at a sign barring minors from entering. "They'll never stop you unless a policeman happens to be standing right here. My parents don't like me coming, but I just make up some excuse about heavy traffic and they never know."
Read The Rest Scale: 2 out of 5.
Yet, the attempted repression continues:
Because You Just Can't Be Too Totalitarian
Ah, the wings of freedom continue to spread in China.
China is expanding its censorship controls to cover text messages sent using mobile phones.The authorities are quite correct, of course, that these technologies are highly dangerous to them. But how long and well will they be able to bottle up computer communication?New regulations have been issued to allow mobile phone service providers to police and filter messages for pornographic or fraudulent content.
But analysts fear the real targets are political dissidents.
China's authorities are gradually tightening control over the spread of electronic information, particularly on the internet.
A Paris-based group, Reporters Without Borders, says the Chinese authorities are increasingly using new technology to control information.
It says one Chinese company marketing a system to monitor mobile phone text messages has announced it is watching for "false political rumours" and "reactionary remarks".
Venus Info Tech Ltd said in a press release that its surveillance system worked by filtering algorithms based on key words and combinations of key words.
Certain key words could trigger an automatic alert to the police.[...]
Last year, Chinese people sent more than 220bn text messages, more than half of all messages sent in the world, according to China's Xinhua news agency.
Read The Rest Scale: 1 out of 5.
In post-communist Russia:
The Bolshevik Czar
Putin's new symbolism.
The Kremlin has reintroduced one of tsarist Russia's most elaborate and elitist traditions - the imperial races.As root-and-trunk former KGB man Putin continues to centralize power in Russia in himself, increase his control over information, further his personality cult, eliminate all other loci of power, from industrialists to regional governors, and marginalize democrats into non-existence, he increasingly uses the symbols of the past. What does this one tell us about the new Caesar (Tsar)? (The man whose heart President Bush has "looked into" and found to be "good.")At the weekend, President Vladimir Putin for the first time invited his regional governors and heads of former Soviet states to race for the Prize of the President of Russia, just as the tsar invited his subjects to offer horses to race for the Prize of the Emperor, which was last staged for Nicholas II in 1916.
Twelve horses at the Hippodrome stadium in Moscow raced over the largely symbolic distance of 200 metres for the prize of 3m roubles (£56,000), the Interfax news agency said.
In the crowds were well-connected Russians able to afford the 20,000-rouble tickets, as well as senior Kremlin officials, including Mr Putin.
They were joined by the heads of state over whom the Kremlin, apparently nostalgic over its Soviet-era status as a world power, again wants to extend its influence.
Azerbaijan's President Ilham Aliev cheered on his horse, Sweet Mistress, while Kazakhstan's Nursultan Nazarbayev, backed his thoroughbred, nicknamed Grantled, according to the Russian media.
Halatenango, a horse from Chechnya, reportedly entertained crowds by refusing to get into the starting gates. The presidents of Georgia, Uzbekistan, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan and Armenia also entered.
The dignatories watched from a "special guest tribune" where an informal summit for the heads of state was held.
Women wore hats and men morning suits, according to the strict dress code, with the leaders placing bets.
Read The Rest Scale: 1 out of 5.
And to close, an anecdote of the post-cold-war Russia, from Technical Sgt. "John Stryker," posted originally to Amygdala:
Big Rooshin Plane, Not American Poosy
A first for Amygdala: a guest post. Taken from a personal e-mail, utterly casually knocked off, and with permission, from newly promoted (congratulations!) Technical Sergeant "John Stryker":Whoops, gotta read the rest here. :-)That reminds me of a Russian flight crew that I bumped into during Restore Hope. They hadn't been paid since the Soviet Union fell apart, so they'd been freelancing and living on their plane for about six months.I blocked their plane in, and it looked rough. It was dirty, there were panels missing and the tires looked like they were on their last layer of cord.








Putin may be for Russia what Pinochet was to Chile.
Pinochet did a dirty job in a most undemocratic way but in the end strengthening the democratic tradition by leaving when his stated goals were met.
America has done very well with the "authoritarian moving to democracy" model.
Perhaps Bush is saying that Putin is in that mode. An authoritarian democrat.
The order of events seems pretty strict. Centralize authority - there is only one legitimate source of violence. Expand the economy. Technical and economic information must flow freely. Political info may be more restricted. Contracts must be enforced and corruption must not be excessive. Maintain a loose (economic)/ tight (political) system for 30 or 40 years until an economic comfort level is achieved. Then loosen the political controls. voila: Taiwan, South Korea.
It is an ugly model. It requires trust in some very nasty characters. It works. Mostly.
The short version?
Bring order
Foster Economic development
Political liberalization in time
I know. We have screw ups like Mubarak who although a "nice" authoritarian has no clue about economics. I figured Pinochet was worthy of trust when he brought in the Chicago Boys.
And to morph this almost completely into another thread. Netanyahu as Treasury Secratary is Israels #1 secret weapon. Let us hope Mubarak gets the hint.
Oh. And let us hope I'm right about Putin.
"Bring order
Foster Economic development
Political liberalization in time"
That's also the Chinese communist model, you know.
Frankly, if I were a totalitarian dictator wanting to keep a death grip on absolute power, a decadent youth culture would be a godsend (no pun intended)
What easier generation to rule than one obsessed with sex, drugs and rock 'n roll?
As long as the goods keep rolling in, a materialist, consumption oriented generation is barely awake to issues such as abuse of freedom or corruption in high places.
Let it ride ChiComs, let it ride.
This is off-topic, but given the internationalist bent of this site, someone should be blogging on the current Indonesian election. After all, Indonesia IS the MOST populous Muslim country.
I would say that the project of democratization in the Muslim world is, by fits and starts, going forward. Look at Indonesia and Turkey.
Also, neither of these has to do with "bringing democracy through the barrel of a gun".
M. Simon:
I suggest you read this before concluding Putin might be a good guy.
Symposium: KGB Resurrection
"...someone should be blogging on the current Indonesian election."
Without doubt. Fortunately, others are. I highly recommend that, fine as Winds of Change is, you don't read it as your sole blog. Probably you don't. Taking your words as the doubtlessly helpful suggestion you intended, and speaking, of course, only for myself, I thank you. Alas that all of us, even collectively, have only limited time, knowledge, and world enough.
When I have something fresh and intelligent to say about the Indonesian election, I shall be sure to post it. Meanwhile I shall wait breathlessly for Year Of Living Dangerously II.
Ha! Nice! Like the sense of humor, even if it is at my expense!
Gary,
Nice try.
Have the communists made it work yet? Can they be trusted?
Our record speaks for itself. Failures and successes. The Chi comms have any successes in this regards yet? We know about Tibet. We know the reversals of Hong Kong. We know about China's Taiwan diplomacy. All this may lead to a good result but it appears that old bad habits die hard if they die at all.
Of course the votes haven't been counted on the Russian efforts either. The efforts of Latvia, Estonia, and Poland among others will have some influence in Russian affairs.
===========================================As to Putin. It is hard to tell what is in the heart of a man without watching what he does unfold. Pinochet didn't look so good until after he left. So I can't say much about Putin until he leaves the stage.
I am however looking forward to the reports of my #2 son who is studying Russian at the University of Chicago and planning a trip there next year. If I hear anything interesting I'll report.
============================================All I can say about American policy is that it seems to work. And when we get stuck with a bad actor like "Pinneaple Face" we do the military thing and remove him. If possible.
It is not a pretty policy. It fails. But each success is one less problem and possibly one more ally in the world. Keep up the pressure for 100 years and you get a different world. So far we are only sixty years into what promises to be a two century effort.
So far, so good.
"Nice try.
Have the communists made it work yet? Can they be trusted?"
Doubtlessly because I'm very slow, I'm entirely unclear what you are trying to say. I don't know if you're calling me a communist -- which would be pleasantly nostalgic -- or if you have somehow misread what I wrote as some sort of defense of the Chinese evolution of communism -- I can't imagine how, but why you are asking me the above questions, along with adding "nice try" is a mystery to me -- or what.
I apologize for my inadequate comprehension abilities. I am only an egg.
I shall take under advisement your suggestion that "after he left" Pinochet "looks good."
I was under the impression that your mention of Chinese policy to be similar to the American either to be:
1. The Chinese are doing the right thing (not apparent yet)
2. America is doing the wrong thing. (our policy seems to be working if only in fits and starts)
Perhaps I am the thick one: what exactly did you mean by that remark?
=====================================Pinochet did three things necessary for the emergence of democracy.
1. He eliminated violent competition for political control of Chile (the Shining Path). You can't do business without security - and reasonably honest government.
2. He got the government's economic policy on sound footing (He privatized Social Security. That private money now helps provide capital to the economy instead of perks to politicians - America should be so lucky)
3. The most important thing he did for the future of democracy was to leave when he had accomplished his goals. Unusual for a despot.
In other words he was a democratic authoritarian. America looks for that sort when it is auditioning leaders. Of course like any job interview the person selected may not be suitable for the job.
M. Simon writes: "I was under the impression that your mention of Chinese policy to be similar to the American...."
What remark are you referring to?
I thought I was quite clearly condemning aspects of both Russia and China for not having moved at all as far away from communism as many people assume they have. That was the entire point of my post. I don't know any other way to read my post. But I congratulate you for having found one.
"In other words he was a democratic authoritarian. America looks for that sort when it is auditioning leaders. Of course like any job interview the person selected may not be suitable for the job."
Although it is difficult to read this otherwise, I'd like to confirm: are you asserting that it was America that put Pinochet in charge?