Winds of Change.NET: Liberty. Discovery. Humanity. Victory.

Formal Affiliations
  • Anti-Idiotarian Manifesto
  • Euston Democratic Progressive Manifesto
  • Real Democracy for Iran!
  • Support Denamrk
  • Million Voices for Darfur
  • milblogs
Syndication
 Subscribe in a reader

USA: Dem Party Renewal Archives

Recently in USA: Dem Party Renewal Category

February 25, 2011

Satan Buys Earmuffs. I Violently (Can I Still Say That?) Agree With A Crooks And Liars Blogger.

By Armed Liberal at 17:35

...or he agrees with me.

One of the points I've made for eight or nine years blogging is that the Democratic Party has abandoned working people, except for a few favored ones - public sector unions being one of the exceptions. I've been derided for it, but it's true so I really don't care.

I'm delighted to see someone on a progblog come out and say it as well.

Here's Brad Reed at Crooks And Liars:
For far too long the Democratic Party leadership has supported policies that have screwed blue-collar Midwesterners as much as any Republican policies have -- after all, remember that the repeal of Glass-Stegal got more than 90 votes in the U.S. Senate and was signed into law by a Democratic president. Instead of constantly asking ourselves, "What's the matter with these silly Midwesterners?" we should probably be asking, "Why the hell isn't our supposed center-left party looking out for all workers' interests?"
Is that a light that I see?
-

| Direct Link | 6 Comments | | Printer-Friendly
  • MikeDC: PD, I think this is right on. When I read read more
  • PD Shaw: What about the working man? My grandfather was a union read more
  • chuck: "Is that a light I see?" Yeah, but it's a read more
-->

January 16, 2011

The Nub Of What Is Wrong With Modern Liberalism

By Armed Liberal at 00:37

Here's a Brad De Long comment about Mickey Kaus (from Mickey's site)
When Mickey stops trying to destroy the careers of twenty-something journalists, I'll talk to him...

Until then, I won't - and you shouldn't carry water for him either. He's not a good person. Yours,

Brad DeLong
Not - "he's deeply wrong because," Not even "He's deeply wrong."

"He's not a good person."

Public liberals need to believe they have a better model - not the only model - and that those who disagree are fellow citizens who have different policy positions (and in some cases different values).

And it's not uncommon. Last weekend I was at a party in Manhattan; a room full of nice people and I probably spoke with a dozen of them. Unifrmly liberal - although amusingly when I was critical of the bank bailouts and argued that Obama should have rescued homeowners and banks, not just banks and Wall Street, I was strongly and uniformly criticized. Not one of them was willing to believe that conservatives or Tea Partiers had anything to say, and the feeling was that polite society just didn't listen to anything they had to say.

Get the f**k over yourselves, people.
-

| Direct Link | 17 Comments | | Printer-Friendly
  • alchemist: Sorry, don't watch Olbermann. Or any cable news. At some read more
  • Glen Wishard: I'm just saying the perception from people on the left read more
  • alchemist: Tim, You're right. I'm just saying the perception from people read more

November 11, 2010

The Hidden Liberals

By Armed Liberal at 19:27

So sockpuppet-master Glenn Greenwald (that never gets tiresome, does it?) rips into Larry O'Donnell for not being progressive enough - really!!

The core of Greenwald's electoral argument, though, is one that needs to be examined. He says that:
As for the substance of our discussion, O'Donnell -- in standard cable TV form -- basically had one simplistic point he repeated over and over: exit polls show that only a small minority of voters (a) self-identify as "liberal" and (b) agree that government should do more. There are so many obvious flaws in that "analysis." To begin with, exit polls survey only those who vote; it excludes those who chose not to vote, including the massive number of Democrats and liberals who voted in 2006 and 2008 but stayed at home this time. The failure to inspire those citizens to vote is, beyond doubt, a major cause of the Democrats' loss...
This is the Left's version of a tune the Right often plays as well..."if only we had candidates as pure as our electorate."

In which they imagine the hidden voters springing forth, bosoms heaving, in response to the Man On The White Horse (or with the correct ideological spin). My reaction is "whatever". But it's a real question.

| Direct Link | 19 Comments | | Printer-Friendly

read the rest! »

  • toc3: Glenn, re: my reply to you in post #14. Much read more
  • MikeDC: Isn't it sort of ironic that one progressive myth is read more
  • Glen Wishard: The democrats now have 190 seats in the New House read more

November 2, 2010

"Requiem for the Pelosi Democrats"

By Armed Liberal at 04:39
From the WSJ:
"A lot of rethinking is needed" after Democrats take their drubbing, Mr. Baird says, especially since he anticipates "a huge number of retirements" from Democrats unwilling to serve in the minority. He proposes that the House elect an independent speaker who would help drain partisanship from the body. Britain's House of Commons uses such a model.

Democrats, he says, will also have to recognize why they lost touch with voters. "Back in September, we had pollsters and strategists from my party tell members that the mass of people didn't care about the deficit. The mind-boggling lack of reality coming from some of the people who give us so-called advice is stunning."

| Direct Link | 19 Comments | | Printer-Friendly
  • Joe Katzman: My problem with Baird is the same as the "morning read more
  • Marcus Vitruvius: Toc3, #11, In all seriousness, I think most of the read more
  • Marcus Vitruvius: Alchemist #7: Alas, while it's a nice dream, I think read more

October 26, 2010

Dizzy Yet??

By Armed Liberal at 00:23

Jerome Armstrong writes a post I could have written...(checking the temperature in Hell...)
1. The Democrats became the face (you could argue they embraced it), of the DC banker bailout culture of the privileged (those with access), while the average American has been downsized.

2. For those of you who have been at the forefront of the attacking the Tea Party enthusiasts, bloggers or otherwise, give yourself a big pat on the back for going after (usually in a obnoxious elitist manner) this years swing voters.

3. Tim Kaine, with the status-quo Moving America Forward, delivered a faulty to the core messaging. Saying that the status-quo is just fine will go down as an out-of-touch, and helping to exacerbate the losses. He really should be fired, and so should the pollsters and consultants who advocated for this messaging disaster.
-

| Direct Link | No Comments | | Printer-Friendly

September 30, 2010

Well, You F***ed Up...You Trusted Him

By Armed Liberal at 21:44

You know, I believed this was true and just told myself that it was impossible.

I even told myself that Obama might not believe in our military activities overseas, but that he saw some wisdom in them.

And I was a fool. Here's Jackson Diehl, in the Washington Post:

One of the most remarkable aspects of Bob Woodward's new book, "Obama's Wars," is its portrait of a White House that has all but resigned itself to failure in Afghanistan. As Woodward recounts it, by last spring -- just six months after President Obama announced the dispatch of 30,000 additional U.S. troops, along with a modified counterinsurgency strategy -- virtually every civilian official at the National Security Council and in the vice president's office had concluded that the plan was doomed.


If that doesn't offend you, you're not paying attention. Forget my outrage as the father of a soldier whose life Obama was prepared to waste in support of a cause he and his team have no faith in - I'm outraged as a taxpayer, as a citizen, as someone who relies on my government to defend me and mine and to advance the causes of our nation.

No wonder Obama is uncomfortable around military families. Not only does he think they were fools for enlisting but greater fools to march forward into hazard in the service of a plan he doesn't believe in.

-

| Direct Link | 10 Comments | | Printer-Friendly
  • toc3: Happy to hear that, mark. read more
  • Armed Liberal: Thorley, he's home!! Safe, remarkably sound, and ready to move read more
  • Thorley Winston: Second the wishes for Marc’s son to come home safe, read more

May 5, 2010

Remember Obama And Big Donors?

By Armed Liberal at 16:39

From back in 2008??

Today in Politico:
While the BP oil geyser pumps millions of gallons of petroleum into the Gulf of Mexico, President Barack Obama and members of Congress may have to answer for the millions in campaign contributions they've taken from the oil and gas giant over the years.

BP and its employees have given more than $3.5 million to federal candidates over the past 20 years, with the largest chunk of their money going to Obama, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Donations come from a mix of employees and the company's political action committees - $2.89 million flowed to campaigns from BP-related PACs and about $638,000 came from individuals.
That's gotta be giving Axelrod a headache...
-

| Direct Link | 1 Comment | | Printer-Friendly
  • Foobarista: Obama owned by Big Oil and Wall Street? Say it read more

April 1, 2010

Doing Well By Doing Good

By Armed Liberal at 06:56

Progressive journalist Rogers Cadenhead looks into Jane Hamsher's PAC filings and notes that it's been very, very good to her (and Glenn Greenwald)...

Accountability Now collected $113,695 in donations during 2009, as it reported to the FEC, and spent $169,992 that year on nine consultants. Six of those people managed the committee: The PAC paid Hamsher $24,000, another $24,000 to PAC cofounder Glenn Greenwald of Salon.Com, $65,710 to two executive directors and $38,047 to two management consultants.

| Direct Link | 21 Comments | | Printer-Friendly

read the rest! »

  • Armed Liberal: Roland, check out this old post of mine to get read more
  • Roland Nikles: I don't know Jane Hamsher, Firedoglake, or any of the read more
  • David Blue: Bingo, Glen. Imagine: a gang of bank-robbers hired a woman read more

March 19, 2010

Our "Populist" Democratic Party

By Armed Liberal at 05:31

In case you wonder why I worry that my Democratic leadership can't manage to get in gear with the public...
But the FEC data suggest plenty of wealthy donors continued to support Democrats with their checkbooks, at least through December.

The Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee together took in more than $37.3 million from donors who gave $10,000 or more during the year, the FEC data show. On the GOP side, donors at the same level gave less than $15.6 million to the Republican National Committee, the National Republican Senatorial Committee and the National Republican Congressional Committee combined, the data show.

The overall money race is much closer, with Democratic committees raising $141 million and the GOP close behind at $137.6 million. The Democratic committees, in other words, got more than twice as much of their individual contributions from big donors as Republicans did.

The contrast was particularly sharp between the DNC, which received 60 percent of its money from donations of less than $200, and the RNC, which took in nearly 80 percent of its receipts from the smallest donors. The RNC still edged out the DNC by $4 million in total money raised from individuals.
Large donors, in my view, tend to be 'investors' in government more than simply fans...what will it take to grow a Democratic Party that is connected to the $200 donors??
-

| Direct Link | 13 Comments | | Printer-Friendly
  • bgates: Alchemist is right. Corporations should be prohibited from engaging in read more
  • Joe Katzman: Perry, you're correct, AND, unfortunately, the problem is not confined read more
  • charris208.myopenid.com: I was saying in my imaginary/non-existent system a certain amount read more

Stay Classy, Netroots...

By Armed Liberal at 18:18

So Mickey Kaus is debating running against "Call me Senator" Boxer - which would be a hoot since Mickey is clearly policy-informed enough to create some really, really interesting debates if Boxer is ever brave enough to subject herself to a debate with a mere citizen. He won't win, but it'd be a fascinating way to kick some policy issues open and into public view, which is what I assume he's doing.

The netroots blogs are alive with comments tagging Mickey for - basically - having gay sex with goats. I was kind of scratching my head on this one, and so turned to Da Google, and discovered that Juicebox Matt Yglesias did a post on October 14, 2007 where he - to put it mildly - challenged Mickey for supporting those AWFUL allegations that John Edwards had been having an affair with Rielle Hunter (the post is gone from the Atlantic, but the Google cache is still alive):
| Direct Link | 9 Comments | | Printer-Friendly

read the rest! »

  • zanzibar: this also has a good stuff , zanzibar hotels hotels read more
  • Glen Wishard: Obama really has fallen to abysmal depths if there are read more
  • phantommut: The thing about Kaus is that as a journalist, he's read more

January 20, 2010

Massachusettes

By Armed Liberal at 03:44

Ann Althouse pretty neatly summed up my macro reaction to the Massachusetts election:
Poor Obama! It's the eve of the anniversary of his inauguration. The State of the Union was supposed to be very grand. And now what? He has been repudiated! He made this election a referendum on the Democrats agenda, and the people of Massachusetts, the most liberal state, gave him a resounding no.

Now, I think that could be good for Obama. He's a man of change. Let him change. I hope he becomes the President I thought he could be when I voted for him. With the midterm elections looming in the fall, he can readjust, set himself apart from Congress. Take the people seriously.
I've got to believe that healthcare is headed for the wheels of the bus, because both Obama and the Democratic elites are passionate, primarily, about one thing - being re-elected. And the optics of their taking a stand on top of the monstrous pile of paper that this bill has metastized into in the face of such public opposition...and in the face of the weak coattails that Obama has shown to date...would be devastating both in 2010 and 2012.

| Direct Link | 21 Comments | | Printer-Friendly

read the rest! »

  • paul.brinkley.myopenid.com: I've posed this question elsewhere, and would like as much read more
  • PD Shaw: alchemist, you make good points. Our current system is unsustainable. read more
  • mark buehner: "If this comes to pass, any system that controls costs read more

January 20, 2010

I'm Assuming You've Seen This...

By Armed Liberal at 03:10

...arguably the best commentary on today's election I've run into so far:

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Mass Backwards
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political HumorHealth Care Crisis

"...the Republicans are playing chess while the Democrats are in the nurse's office because they glued their..."
| Direct Link | No Comments | | Printer-Friendly
Recent Comments
  • TM Lutas: Jobs' formula was simple enough. Passionately care about your users, read more
  • sabinesgreenp.myopenid.com: Just seeing the green community in action makes me confident read more
  • Glen Wishard: Jobs was on the losing end of competition many times, read more
  • Chris M: Thanks for the great post, Joe ... linked it on read more
  • Joe Katzman: Collect them all! Though the French would be upset about read more
  • Glen Wishard: Now all the Saudis need is a division's worth of read more
  • mark buehner: Its one thing to accept the Iranians as an ally read more
  • J Aguilar: Saudis were around here (Spain) a year ago trying the read more
  • Fred: Good point, brutality didn't work terribly well for the Russians read more
  • mark buehner: Certainly plausible but there are plenty of examples of that read more
  • Fred: They have no need to project power but have the read more
  • mark buehner: Good stuff here. The only caveat is that a nuclear read more
  • Ian C.: OK... Here's the problem. Perceived relevance. When it was 'Weapons read more
  • Marcus Vitruvius: Chris, If there were some way to do all these read more
  • Chris M: Marcus Vitruvius, I'm surprised by your comments. You're quite right, read more
The Winds Crew
Town Founder: Left-Hand Man: Other Winds Marshals
  • 'AMac', aka. Marshal Festus (AMac@...)
  • Robin "Straight Shooter" Burk
  • 'Cicero', aka. The Quiet Man (cicero@...)
  • David Blue (david.blue@...)
  • 'Lewy14', aka. Marshal Leroy (lewy14@...)
  • 'Nortius Maximus', aka. Big Tuna (nortius.maximus@...)
Other Regulars Semi-Active: Posting Affiliates Emeritus:
Winds Blogroll
Author Archives
Categories
Powered by Movable Type 4.23-en