"IN the following pages I offer nothing more than simple facts, plain arguments, and common sense; and have no other preliminaries to settle with the reader, than that he will divest himself of prejudice and prepossession, and suffer his reason and his feelings to determine for themselves; that he will put on, or rather that he will not put off, the true character of a man, and generously enlarge his views beyond the present day ...
The cause of America is in a great measure the cause of all mankind. Many circumstances hath, and will arise, which are not local, but universal, and through which the principles of all Lovers of Mankind are affected, and in the Event of which, their Affections are interested."
Thinking about the recent first election in Iraq, I remembered Thomas Paine. A common man with no great achievements in the world, he turned his passion for freedom into a series of pamphlets that brought the situation in the British colonies into stark relief and coalesced American public demand for independence.
The blogosphere resembles nothing so much as the pamphlateering that dominated political discourse in those days before the American revolution. Views are posted, sometimes anonymously, and all those who feel they have a stake in the outcome are free to debate the rights and wrongs of things. In this vein, I will from time to time post here some excerpts from the great American dialogue, which has stretched now for nearly 300 years. These are not Holy Writ to be worshipped - but they are the thoughts of men and women who have wrestled with many of the same issues we face today. Today's excerpt is from Paine's Common Sense, written in 1776 on the eve of armed conflict:
Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil in its worst state an intolerable one ...In order to gain a clear and just idea of the design and end of government, let us suppose a small number of persons settled in some sequestered part of the earth, unconnected with the rest, they will then represent the first peopling of any country, or of the world. In this state of natural liberty, society will be their first thought. A thousand motives will excite them thereto, the strength of one man is so unequal to his wants, and his mind so unfitted for perpetual solitude, that he is soon obliged to seek assistance and relief of another, who in his turn requires the same. Four or five united would be able to raise a tolerable dwelling in the midst of a wilderness, but one man might labor out the common period of life without accomplishing any thing ...
Thus necessity, like a gravitating power, would soon form our newly arrived emigrants into society, the reciprocal blessings of which, would supersede, and render the obligations of law and government unnecessary while they remained perfectly just to each other; but as nothing but heaven is impregnable to vice, it will unavoidably happen, that in proportion as they surmount the first difficulties of emigration, which bound them together in a common cause, they will begin to relax in their duty and attachment to each other; and this remissness, will point out the necessity, of establishing some form of government to supply the defect of moral virtue.
Some convenient tree will afford them a State-House, under the branches of which, the whole colony may assemble to deliberate on public matters. It is more than probable that their first laws will have the title only of REGULATIONS, and be enforced by no other penalty than public disesteem. In this first parliament every man, by natural right will have a seat...
Here then is the origin and rise of government; namely, a mode rendered necessary by the inability of moral virtue to govern the world; here too is the design and end of government, viz. freedom and security.
The prejudice of Englishmen, in favor of their own government by king, lords, and commons, arises as much or more from national pride than reason. Individuals are undoubtedly safer in England than in some other countries, but the will of the king is as much the law of the land in Britain as in France, with this difference, that instead of proceeding directly from his mouth, it is handed to the people under the most formidable shape of an act of parliament. For the fate of Charles the First (beheaded by Parliament - ed), hath only made kings more subtle not more just.
Wherefore, laying aside all national pride and prejudice in favor of modes and forms, the plain truth is, that it is wholly owing to the constitution of the people, and not to the constitution of the government that the crown is not as oppressive in England as in Turkey ...
A government of our own is our natural right: And when a man seriously reflects on the precariousness of human affairs, he will become convinced, that it is infinitely wiser and safer, to form a constitution of our own in a cool deliberate manner, while we have it in our power, than to trust such an interesting event to time and chance ...
As to religion, I hold it to be the indispensible duty of all government, to protect all conscientious professors thereof, and I know of no other business which government hath to do therewith. ... For myself I fully and conscientiously believe, that it is the will of the Almighty, that there should be diversity of religious opinions among us ...
I shall conclude these remarks, with the following timely and well intended hints, We ought to reflect, that there are three different ways by which an independency may hereafter be effected; and that one of those three, will one day or other, be the fate of America, viz. By the legal voice of the people in Congress; by a military power; or by a mob: It may not always happen that our soldiers are citizens, and the multitude a body of reasonable men; virtue, as I have already remarked, is not hereditary, neither is it perpetual. Should an independency be brought about by the first of those means, we have every opportunity and every encouragement before us, to form the noblest, purest constitution on the face of the earth. We have it in our power to begin the world over again.
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again." That is, perhaps, the quintessential creed of America. It is how and why we thrive despite setbacks, absorb waves of immigrants, continually destroy what is no longer useful from the old ways and creatively build something new. It is hubris, it is pride -- but it is also the hard work of generations who came here with little, the freedom to rise in social and economic station and our willingness to embrace all as Americans if they cultivate new roots in this soil.








Thanks, rkb. I look forward to the continuing conversation
Thanks Robin - Isn't it amazing how much of what Mr Paine wrote is still applicable today?
While I like the post very much, I would take exception to your comment "it is hubris." I do not think it reflects the definition of hubris at all (which to me has connotations of over-reaching).
It may, indeed, reflect "pride" -- but only, I think, the definition of a righteous pride; i.e., a confident recognition and affirmation of one's inalienable human dignity, and the product of expression of same.