Winds of Change.NET: Liberty. Discovery. Humanity. Victory.

Formal Affiliations
  • Anti-Idiotarian Manifesto
  • Euston Democratic Progressive Manifesto
  • Real Democracy for Iran!
  • Support Denamrk
  • Million Voices for Darfur
  • milblogs
Syndication
 Subscribe in a reader

Yes on 77. Yes on 76. Yes on 75. Yes on 74. No on everything else.

| 3 Comments

I've been remiss in blogging about the initiatives, but stuff has been happening in my real life, so ... sorry about that.

Let me wrap up some concise arguments on the remaining initiatives, and remind you that regardless of whether you're voting right (like me!) or wrong, get out and vote tomorrow.

Mostly, vote for Prop 77, the anti-gerrymandering bill.

Prop 76 sets out a complex set of caps on state government spending, and moves a significant amount of budgetary power to the executive.

I'm wrestling a bit with this one, because of there was ever a proposition that had "Unintended Consequences" spelled out in big red letters, this is the one. The notion of a mechanical set of limits on state policy (limiting spending is in fact limiting policy) kind of creeps me out.

But I'm more creeped out by the flat inability of multiple generations of state politicians to manage the budget.

So I'm a reluctant "yes" on this one. Even the Governor of Colorado - which recently modified a similar spending cap in an election last month - came out in support of it.

Prop 77 is to me the big one. I've railed for years about the habit politicians have of choosing their voters, and this is the first and best chance we have to make a change in this.

It's not perfect, I'm sure that given an infinite amount of time we could do better, but the Democrats had a chance to work out a compromise with the Governator on this and failed, had a chance to mount their own competing vision for redistricting and failed.

This is the one to vote for if you don't vote for anything else. Lots of reasonable people have come out against it because "it hurts Democrats." I'm a Democrat (believe it or not) but I'm an American and a Californian first, and the notion that someone would suggest that doing something bad for my state or country is a good thing because it will help my party is flatly offensive to me.

Props 78 and 79 are Big Pharma's and Big Law's competing versions of how they will get the cost of drugs under control. Not an issue worth an initiative, and both are too badly flawed. No on both of them.

Prop 80 is an effort to have amateurs reregulate the electrical markets for the state. Nein, danke. That's a big "no, thanks."

So to recap:

Yes on 77. yes on 77, and yes on 77.

Yes on 76.

Yes on 75.

Yes on 74.

No on 73, 78, 79, and 80.

3 Comments

Why no on 73?

In a state where my teenage kids can't have any other medical treatment or participate in any school sport without my permission, they can have an abortion.

I heard a talkradio host today say he had issues about the constitutional rights of teens as his reason for not supporting 73.

Since when was the constitution at odds with parents?

ps. agree with you on all the others.

Alan: AL went into his reasoning behind his vote on 73 here

For another perspective, a friend of mine outlined his thinking on the initiatives, especially an extremely strong "no" on 77, here.

I voted for Arnold over Davis because of A's reform platform, and I see his initiatives in this election as a continuation of that platform, so that's how I'll be voting.

Thanks Tagryn...

Leave a comment

Here are some quick tips for adding simple Textile formatting to your comments, though you can also use proper HTML tags:

*This* puts text in bold.

_This_ puts text in italics.

bq. This "bq." at the beginning of a paragraph, flush with the left hand side and with a space after it, is the code to indent one paragraph of text as a block quote.

To add a live URL, "Text to display":http://windsofchange.net/ (no spaces between) will show up as Text to display. Always use this for links - otherwise you will screw up the columns on our main blog page.




Recent Comments
  • TM Lutas: Jobs' formula was simple enough. Passionately care about your users, read more
  • sabinesgreenp.myopenid.com: Just seeing the green community in action makes me confident read more
  • Glen Wishard: Jobs was on the losing end of competition many times, read more
  • Chris M: Thanks for the great post, Joe ... linked it on read more
  • Joe Katzman: Collect them all! Though the French would be upset about read more
  • Glen Wishard: Now all the Saudis need is a division's worth of read more
  • mark buehner: Its one thing to accept the Iranians as an ally read more
  • J Aguilar: Saudis were around here (Spain) a year ago trying the read more
  • Fred: Good point, brutality didn't work terribly well for the Russians read more
  • mark buehner: Certainly plausible but there are plenty of examples of that read more
  • Fred: They have no need to project power but have the read more
  • mark buehner: Good stuff here. The only caveat is that a nuclear read more
  • Ian C.: OK... Here's the problem. Perceived relevance. When it was 'Weapons read more
  • Marcus Vitruvius: Chris, If there were some way to do all these read more
  • Chris M: Marcus Vitruvius, I'm surprised by your comments. You're quite right, read more
The Winds Crew
Town Founder: Left-Hand Man: Other Winds Marshals
  • 'AMac', aka. Marshal Festus (AMac@...)
  • Robin "Straight Shooter" Burk
  • 'Cicero', aka. The Quiet Man (cicero@...)
  • David Blue (david.blue@...)
  • 'Lewy14', aka. Marshal Leroy (lewy14@...)
  • 'Nortius Maximus', aka. Big Tuna (nortius.maximus@...)
Other Regulars Semi-Active: Posting Affiliates Emeritus:
Winds Blogroll
Author Archives
Categories
Powered by Movable Type 4.23-en